Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4983474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Piezoelectricity and charge trapping in ZnO and Co-doped ZnO thin films

Abstract: Highly efficient isolation of waterborne sound by an air-sealed meta-screen AIP Advances 7, 055001 (2017) Piezoelectricity and charge storage of undoped and Co-doped ZnO thin films were investigated by means of PiezoResponse Force Microscopy and Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy. We found that Co-doped ZnO exhibits a large piezoelectric response, with the mean value of piezoelectric matrix element d 33 slightly lower than in the undoped sample. Moreover, we demonstrate that Co-doping affects the homogeneity of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The O 2 partial pressure was 1 Â 10 À5 mbar for S1, 10 À3 mbar for S2, 10 À2 mbar for S3, and 10 À1 mbar for S4. XRD spectra, according to previous reports, [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] exhibit only the presence of (00l) reflections, indicating a c-axis oriented structure without appreciable secondary phases. In line four-probe dc resistance vs. T measurements were carried out by means of a Keithley current source and a high-impedance Keithley voltmeter, with the probe insert fitted into a closed-cycle refrigerator system operating in the 20-300 K range.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The O 2 partial pressure was 1 Â 10 À5 mbar for S1, 10 À3 mbar for S2, 10 À2 mbar for S3, and 10 À1 mbar for S4. XRD spectra, according to previous reports, [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] exhibit only the presence of (00l) reflections, indicating a c-axis oriented structure without appreciable secondary phases. In line four-probe dc resistance vs. T measurements were carried out by means of a Keithley current source and a high-impedance Keithley voltmeter, with the probe insert fitted into a closed-cycle refrigerator system operating in the 20-300 K range.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Thermoelectric properties can be recovered by reducing thermal conductivity (κ), and increasing electrical conductivity (σ), and Seebeck coefficient ( S ). Experimental and theoretical studies suggest that substitution ZnO with transitional metal elements (M‐ZnO) such as Mn, Ce, Co, Ni, and Al can improve optical, electrical, and thermoelectric properties . Cobalt has received much recognition as a candidate material because the ionic radius of Co 2+ is close to that of Zn 2+ (a Co 2+ = 0.058 nm, a Zn 2+ = 0.06 nm).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental and theoretical studies suggest that substitution ZnO with transitional metal elements (M-ZnO) such as Mn, Ce, Co, Ni, and Al can improve optical, electrical, and thermoelectric properties. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Cobalt has received much recognition as a candidate material because the ionic radius of Co 2+ is close to that of Zn 2+ (a Co 2+ = 0.058 nm, a Zn 2+ = 0.06 nm). It can be a substitute in the host lattice without disturbing the crystalline structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that they obtained significantly higher piezoelectric coefficients for deposition onto flexible substrates and for higher deposition temperatures, which switched the preferred orientation of the PE-ALD ZnO films to (002). A different study, also concerned with nonporous ZnO thin films of a comparable thickness (50 nm), reported a significantly higher piezoelectric coefficient of d 33 = (25 ± 15) pm/V for samples prepared on silicon wafer by pulsed laser deposition (PLD) [ 60 ]. In contrast to the present study, the piezoelectric response of the PLD samples was not assessed with a macroscopic stamp but instead microscopically via piezoresponsive force microscopy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%