2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Piezoelectric osteoarthrectomy for management of ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), less bleeding (Jose et al. ), less postoperative swelling (Sortino et al. ), faster bone remodeling, and better bone healing than bone that was cut with a standard blade (Preti et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), less bleeding (Jose et al. ), less postoperative swelling (Sortino et al. ), faster bone remodeling, and better bone healing than bone that was cut with a standard blade (Preti et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major advantage of this is that it cuts only hard tissues and therefore minimises the risk of damage to adjacent nerves and blood vessels. 23 This case highlights the importance of understanding the close anatomical relationship between the TMJ and surrounding blood vessels, and emphasises the importance of careful surgical planning to minimise any risk of damage to these structures, as this can have disastrous consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…22 The use of the piezoelectric osteotome has also shown promising results with a reduction in intraoperative bleeding in a case series of 35 patients undergoing TMJ ankylosis release. 23 This uses ultrasonic vibrations to make clean cuts in the bone. The major advantage of this is that it cuts only hard tissues and therefore minimises the risk of damage to adjacent nerves and blood vessels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the microvibrations generate a precise cut and maintain a surgical site without blood with good intraoperative control. Increased surgical time and the cost of the device are 2 disadvantages of this technique (Olate et al, 2014;Jose et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%