Pierre Bourdieu in management and organization studies—A citation context analysis and discussion of contributions

Sieweke, Jost

doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2014.04.004

Cited by 63 publications

(51 citation statements)

References 96 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The citation content analysis study by Sieweke (2014) investigated the influence of French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu on 352 citing papers published in nine leading journals in management and organization studies. The SSCI was used to collect papers.…”

Section: 1211mentioning

confidence: 99%

What do citation counts measure? An updated review of studies on citations in scientific documents published between 2006 and 2018

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this paper is to update the review of Bornmann and Daniel (2008) presenting a narrative review of studies on citations in scientific documents. The current review covers 41 studies published between 2006 and 2018. Bornmann and Daniel (2008) focused on earlier years. The current review describes the (new) studies on citation content and context analyses as well as the studies that explore the citation motivation of scholars through surveys or interviews. One focus in this paper is on the technical developments in the last decade, such as the richer meta-data available and machine-readable formats of scientific papers. These developments have resulted in citation context analyses of large datasets in comprehensive studies (which was not possible previously). Many studies in recent years have used computational and machine learning techniques to determine citation functions and polarities, some of which have attempted to overcome the methodological weaknesses of previous studies. The automated recognition of citation functions seems to have the potential to greatly enhance citation indices and information retrieval capabilities. Our review of the empirical studies demonstrates that a paper may be cited for very different scientific and non-scientific reasons. This result accords with the finding by Bornmann and Daniel (2008). The current review also shows that to better understand the relationship between citing and cited documents, a variety of features should be analyzed, primarily the citation context, the semantics and linguistic patterns in citations, citation locations within the citing document, and citation polarity (negative, neutral, positive).

show abstract

Section: 1211mentioning

confidence: 99%

What do citation counts measure? An updated review of studies on citations in scientific documents published between 2006 and 2018

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Anderson and Sun (2010) analysed citations in the context of Walsh and Ungson's work (1991) on organisational memory. Sieweke (2014) carried out research into Pierre Bourdieu's influence on management and organisation studies. Finally, Lu, Ding and Zhang (2017) focused on the citation dynamics of Hirsh (2005) over a period of nine years.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The influence of Elfreda Chatman’s theories: a citation context analysis

González‐Teruel

Abad-García

2018

Scientometrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The range of theoretical frameworks currently being used by researchers into information behaviour is abundant and diverse. We need to examine thoroughly the contribution of theories and models to further research, as this would help to improve future investigations in the field. This paper adopts this approach, by thoroughly examining the influence that Elfreda Chatman's three middle-range theories have had on subsequent research. A citation context analysis was carried out on the basis of those received by Information poverty theory, Life in the round theory and Normative behaviour theory. Analysis covered the year of publication, the type of work and the subject-matter of the citing documents. The cites in context or theoretical incidents were analysed for frequency of citation in citing documents, the content of Chatman's work being cited, the context co-citation analysis, the citation style and the citation location. The analysis of citation in context has allowed us to draw a distinction between the author and her work, while verifying that not all cites are the same. These differences reflect the unequal relevance of these theories to subsequent research.

show abstract

“…As Sieweke () recommended, we considered in this analysis the potential power struggles among actors. Indeed, this sub‐section shows how aspiring global actors, by asserting their specificities and their difference with members of an established global elite contribute to reinforcing the acceptance of a mindset that splits the field into two groups.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, they emphasise the positive effects of social interactions encouraged by global mindset or, conversely, see global mindset only as a positive externalisation of those interactions. The fact that these studies only use sociological concepts such as ‘social capital’ in a piecemeal fashion, disconnecting them from other related concepts (habitus, field and doxa) thus failing to consider the potential power struggles among actors (Sieweke, ), may partly explain this limitation. Finally, the empirical results obtained so far are limited and, in some cases, tautological (individuals endowed with greater capital prove better at developing relationships).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Be global or be gone: Global mindset as a source of division in an international business community

Goxe

Belhoste

2018

European Management Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Global mindset is usually considered as a positive skill or resource that helps individuals and companies succeed internationally. We argue that it is also a collective scheme of thought that brings some actors together and sets others apart. We investigate this perspective through a qualitative study of French MNC managers, internationalisation support providers, and SME owners and managers attempting to create or grow their business in China. We reveal that global mindset is a double-edged concept: it is not solely an instrument for integration, but also a doxa, a particular viewpoint imposed to identify and reject outsiders through symbolic struggles. This alternative conceptualisation is necessary to rethink the social forces at work in the field of international business. It is also necessary to encourage educators and practitioners to acknowledge the struggles that result from the imposition of certain views and behaviours and to adapt education, support and training programs accordingly.

show abstract

Pierre Bourdieu in management and organization studies—A citation context analysis and discussion of contributions

Cited by 63 publications

References 96 publications

What do citation counts measure? An updated review of studies on citations in scientific documents published between 2006 and 2018

What do citation counts measure? An updated review of studies on citations in scientific documents published between 2006 and 2018

The influence of Elfreda Chatman’s theories: a citation context analysis

Be global or be gone: Global mindset as a source of division in an international business community

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About