Piège radiologique et précautions carcinologiques chez une patiente ayant subi un retrait définitif de prothèses mammaires PIP

Koutsomanis, A.; Bruant-Rodier, C.; Roedlich, M.N.; Bretz-Grenier, M.-F.; Perrot, Pierre; Bodin, F.

doi:10.1016/j.anplas.2015.06.012

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Two reports have previously described a seroma forming in the fibrous capsule within a few months after explantation, but we find no reports on seroma mimicking breast implants several years after explantation [3] , [4] .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 87%

Case Report: Breast Seroma Mimicking Breast Implants

Sylvester-Hvid

Avnstorp

Wagenblast

et al. 2017

International Journal of Surgery Case Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 87%

Case Report: Breast Seroma Mimicking Breast Implants

Sylvester-Hvid

Avnstorp

Wagenblast

et al. 2017

International Journal of Surgery Case Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In 2010, the French agency Agence Nationale de Securité du Médicament et des Produit de Santé suspended the use of gelatinous silicone breast implants produced by Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP), due to the use in its manufacture of non-approved material that could cause loss of integrity of the implants, and the removal of these implants from the market was recommended. ( 6 , 7 )…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A review of data in medical request and the patient questionnaire for magnetic resonance evaluation of silicone breast implants

Anger

Elías

Moraes

et al. 2017

Einstein (São Paulo)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo analyze the quality and quantity of data in the questionnaires and in request forms for magnetic resonance imaging.MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted with data from 300 medical records. The research used the following data from the questionnaires: patient age, reason for the magnetic resonance imaging, reason for placing the breast implant, report of any signs or symptoms, time elapsed since surgery to place the current breast implant, replacement implant surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiation therapy treatments. From the magnetic resonance imaging request forms, information about the breast implant, the implant placement surgery, patient clinical information and ordering physician specialty were verified.ResultsThe mean age of patients was 48.8 years, and the mean time elapsed since breast implant surgery was 5 years. A total of 60% of women in the sample were submitted to aesthetic surgery, while 23.7% were submitted to chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. In the request forms, 23.7% of physicians added some piece of information about the patient, whereas 2.3% of them informed the type of implant and 5.2% informed about the surgery.ConclusionThe amount of information in the magnetic resonance imaging request forms is very limited, and this may hinder quality of radiological reports. Institutional and technological measures should be implemented to encourage the requesting physicians and radiologists to share information.

show abstract