2023
DOI: 10.1109/tro.2023.3236942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Piecewise Linear Strain Cosserat Model for Soft Slender Manipulator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, researchers have been exploring alternative representations that more effectively preserve the continuity conditions of the deformable continuums. Examples of alternative representations of bases include piecewise linear [116], affine curvature [117], [118], Fourier cosine/sine series [112], [119], Legendre or Chebyshev [79], [114], and actuation load bases [80]. The Sorotoki package offers access to a library of anonymous functions, facilitating the utilization of a range of basis functions.…”
Section: ) Library Of Modal Strain Basesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, researchers have been exploring alternative representations that more effectively preserve the continuity conditions of the deformable continuums. Examples of alternative representations of bases include piecewise linear [116], affine curvature [117], [118], Fourier cosine/sine series [112], [119], Legendre or Chebyshev [79], [114], and actuation load bases [80]. The Sorotoki package offers access to a library of anonymous functions, facilitating the utilization of a range of basis functions.…”
Section: ) Library Of Modal Strain Basesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a comprehensive study on the modeling of continuum robots, see [25,26]. [23] Cosserat Linear × × 7% Wang et al [27] Cosserat Linear × -Dou et al [28] Euler-Bernoulli Linear × Less than 8% Huang et al [29] Variable Curvature Linear × × 2.89% Niu et al [30] Cosserat Linear × × Less than 4% Ghoreishi et al [31] Euler-Bernoulli Linear × -Li et al [32] Cosserat Linear × Less than 5% Caasenbrood et al [33] Piece-wise Constant Curvature Non-Linear × RMS error was ±0.55…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meng et al [66] Lagrange formula settle out to 0 length and velocity Mustaza et al [67] Lagrange formula <5% Position, length, angle Godage et al [68] Lagrange formula ~0.02% Length Mishra et al [72] Cosserat-rod theory settle out to 0 Angles Trivedi et al [73] Cosserat rod theory ~5% Length, angles Godage et al [74] Lagrange formula 11% Length Sofla et al [75] Lagrange formula 7% Angles, position Wang et al [76] Deflection theorem <8.5% Angles, length Pourghasemi et al [80] Cosserat rod theory 1.27% Position, angles Li et al [81] Cosserat rod theory 5.4% Position Alessi et al [82] Cosserat rod theory 4.83% Length Furthermore, our study supports Li et al's [81] proposed resolution of differentially experimental postulations intrinsic to the Cosserat Rod framework using the piecewise linear deformation method. This approach can be adeptly applied to a pliable, slender, manipulative construct.…”
Section: Author Theoretical Basis Relative Error Object Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%