2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2015.161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Piecewise Flat Embedding for Image Segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also worth pointing out that our hierarchical segmentation framework can be used in combination with other features that can better guide the boundary classification. For example, using the most recent piecewise flat embedding (PFE) [24], we expect the results to be further improved in a manner similar to the results from “MCG” to “PFE-MCG” on BSDS500 in Table IV.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also worth pointing out that our hierarchical segmentation framework can be used in combination with other features that can better guide the boundary classification. For example, using the most recent piecewise flat embedding (PFE) [24], we expect the results to be further improved in a manner similar to the results from “MCG” to “PFE-MCG” on BSDS500 in Table IV.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In this section, we compare our proposed iterative hierarchical merge tree method (CCM + ensemble boundary classifier + iteration, under name “HMT”) with various other state-of-the-art region segmentation methods and benchmarks [1], [25], [26], [23], [49], [22], [24] in very recent years on the public data sets. The results are shown in Table IV.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of PFE+MCG [33]. It is noteworthy that our method and theirs are complementary, and the combination of the two may yield even better results.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…is either 'w' or 'o', denoting whether residual-based channel weighting is turned on or not; [size] is the width of neighborhood window(default value is 11); and [norm] is either '1' or 'p', '1' for the L 1,1 -regularized objective and 'p' for the L 1,p -regularized (p = 1) objective. For example, goPFE 1 , the same version as in [23], meaning PFE is computed using the L 1,1 -regularized objective in (8) and GMM based initialization without channel weighting. And swPFE p means PFE is computed using the L 1,p -regularized objective in (3), residual-based channel weighting and the WSC initialization.…”
Section: Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%