2017 4th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics (EECSI) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/eecsi.2017.8239138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PID designs using DE and PSO algorithms for damping oscillations in a DC motor speed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the PID controller architecture using M1-PSO causes the overshoot rate in the step response curve to be reduced compared to M2-PSO and classic PSO. The simulation results have shown that the first scenario based on inertia weight function (W3) gives a better response compared to the second scenario and classic PSO and it reaches the global minimum value in fewer iteration numbers compared to the previous study [11,12]. Indeed, the obtained simulation results encourage to apply the proposed approach in practical control systems.…”
Section: Discussion Of Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other words, the PID controller architecture using M1-PSO causes the overshoot rate in the step response curve to be reduced compared to M2-PSO and classic PSO. The simulation results have shown that the first scenario based on inertia weight function (W3) gives a better response compared to the second scenario and classic PSO and it reaches the global minimum value in fewer iteration numbers compared to the previous study [11,12]. Indeed, the obtained simulation results encourage to apply the proposed approach in practical control systems.…”
Section: Discussion Of Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…For example [7][8][9], the Ziegler and Nichols method may provide a high order system with big overshoots, highly oscillatory and longer settling time. To solve these challenges and difficulties, various approaches have been proposed to find optimum PID parameters such as [10] meta-heuristic algorithms [11], differential evolution (DE) [12], Flower Pollination Algorithm (FPA) [13], genetic algorithms (GN) [14], Levenberg-Marquardt Algorithm (LMA) [15], Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm (GWO) [16], Jaya optimization algorithm (JOA) [17], PSO [18,19], Improved Sine Cosine Algorithm (ISCA) [20]. These are optimization methods that have been introduced to tune the controller parameters for speed control of the DC motor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MZN tuning formulas are given in Table 2 [20]- [21]. From response curve of T.F in (7) as shown in Figure 5 can be obtained the parameters a, L and T, a= 0.0343, L= 0.0077, T= 0.2259. We will get: Kp= 27.7, Ki=Kp/Ti =87.586 and Kd=Kp*Td =0.1002.…”
Section: Modified Ziegler-nichols Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a typical actuator used in various mechanical systems and commercial products, including rolling mills, traction devices, industrial robots, and educational robots [1][2][3][4][5]. These advantages motivate researchers to create various algorithms and strategies for control of DC motor speed and position [6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%