2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2014.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Picture change error in quasirelativistic electron/spin density, Laplacian and bond critical points

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…− complex is of no real influence [80]. Although the DKH2 approach does not completely decouple the large and small component of the Dirac Hamiltonian, while IOTC and/or X2C methods do [68,81,82,83,33], it has been shown that for the Cu atom the electron and spin densities as well as spin contamination at DKH2 and IOTC UHF levels of theory agree well with each other [79,80].…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…− complex is of no real influence [80]. Although the DKH2 approach does not completely decouple the large and small component of the Dirac Hamiltonian, while IOTC and/or X2C methods do [68,81,82,83,33], it has been shown that for the Cu atom the electron and spin densities as well as spin contamination at DKH2 and IOTC UHF levels of theory agree well with each other [79,80].…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Although the DKH2 approach does not completely decouple the large and small component of the Dirac Hamiltonian, while IOTC and/or X2C methods do [68,81,82,83,33], it has been shown that for the Cu atom the electron and spin densities as well as spin contamination at DKH2 and IOTC UHF levels of theory agree well with each other [79,80]. This has been further confirmed by the IOTC vs. DKH2 difference electron and spin density plots of the [OsCl 5 (Hpz)] − complex [80]. Therefore the DKH2 Hamiltonian has been used as the default within this study without the loss of generality.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect Komorovsky shows how the many fermions trueK̂ operator and the pseudo Kramers operator K̂ are related to each other, including explicit arguments on properties and behavior of K̂2 eigenvalues. Moreover, it has already been shown how the proper K̂2 eigenfunctions do look like, not only for the single reference pseudo Kramers cases (hydrogen, helium, and lithium atoms), but also for the “high spin” |Mk|=No He* (triplet) and Li* (quartet) cases with eigenfunctions of multireference character . Note that in the Kramers restricted open regime, the expectation value of the pseudo Kramers operator is equal to ‐ N 0 for a single reference wavefunction, showing on the relevance of pseudo Kramers operator with respect to the 2‐component electronic structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As in the case of nonrelativistic calculations one can exploit or not Kramers and/or time‐reversal symmetry in the 2c/4c calculations. It is of no real surprise that the analog of spin contamination of a single reference unrestricted wave function can be detected also at the Kramers unrestricted level of theory and can be assigned to the extent of higher excitation rank determinants in the Kramers unrestricted wave function . This has been achieved by means of enforcing additivity within Kramers (time‐reversal) symmetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation