2008
DOI: 10.1080/10986060802425539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Picture Books as an Impetus for Kindergartners' Mathematical Thinking

Abstract: Although there is evidence that the use of picture books affects young children's achievement scores in mathematics, little is known about the cognitive engagement and, in particular, the mathematical thinking that is evoked when young children are read a picture book. The focus of the case study reported in this article is on the cognitive engagement that is facilitated by the picture books themselves and not on how this engagement is prompted by a reader. The book under investigation, Vijfde zijn [Being Fift… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
48
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Our studies (Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen and Van den Boogaard 2008;Elia et al 2010) that were set up to investigate children's spontaneous reactions when they are read a picture book, revealed that reading picture books can indeed make children cognitively active and can lead to mathematics-related utterances. In one of the studies (Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen and Van den Boogaard 2008) four 5-year-old children were individually read Vijfde zijn [Being Fifth] (Jandl and Junge 2000) without any questioning and probing.…”
Section: The Pico-ma Projectmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our studies (Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen and Van den Boogaard 2008;Elia et al 2010) that were set up to investigate children's spontaneous reactions when they are read a picture book, revealed that reading picture books can indeed make children cognitively active and can lead to mathematics-related utterances. In one of the studies (Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen and Van den Boogaard 2008) four 5-year-old children were individually read Vijfde zijn [Being Fifth] (Jandl and Junge 2000) without any questioning and probing.…”
Section: The Pico-ma Projectmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, we tried to enhance the power of the books and cognitive involvement of the children by having the teachers as a role model of cognitive engagement or as a person who provokes discussion with the children that brings them to mathematical reasoning as well. Therefore, we suggested to the teachers involved in our project that they themselves react to the story and pictures in the picture books by performing behavior such as (a) asking oneself questions, (b) playing dumb, and (c) showing inquiring expressions (see Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen et al 2009;Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen and Elia 2013).…”
Section: The Pico-ma Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Πιο συγκεκριμένα, έρευνες (Hong, 1996;Jennings, Jennings, Richey & Dixon-Kraus, 1992;Young-Loveridge, 2004) οι οποίες χρησιμοποίησαν ως αφόρμηση, για τον σχεδιασμό μαθησιακών δραστηριοτήτων, εικονογραφημένο βιβλίο, κατέγραψαν βελτίωση στη μαθηματική επίδοση των μαθητών, αύξηση του ενδιαφέροντός τους για τα μαθηματικά, καθώς και αύξηση της χρήσης μαθηματικού λεξιλογίου στο ελεύθερο παιχνίδι τους. Επιπλέον, έχει φανεί ότι ακόμα και η απλή ανάγνωση εικονογραφημένου βιβλίου στα παιδιά, χωρίς σαφή πρόθεση για διδασκαλία ή παρακίνηση, ενισχύει την εμπλοκή τους στις μαθηματικές έννοιες και διαδικασίες του βιβλίου (Van Den Heuvel-Panhuizen & Van Den Boogaard, 2008). Επίσης, μέσω του εικονογραφημένου βιβλίου μπορεί να παραχθεί ένα μοντέλο, να απεικονιστεί μια έννοια, να τεθεί ένας προβληματισμός, να ενθαρρυνθεί η διερεύνηση (Griffiths & Clyne, 1991).…”
Section: το εικονογραφημένο βιβλίο ως πλαίσιο για τις μαθηματικές δραunclassified
“…Through RLMI, students have the opportunity to learn mathematics concepts both abstractly as well as through real‐life applications. Note that many have argued that there is a necessary sequencing between abstract and real‐life content instruction (Boaler, ; Van den Heuvel‐Panhuizen & Van den Boogaard, ). However, whether there is an effectiveness to a particular sequencing is beyond the scope of this empirical study and impossible to test with this study's data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%