Picture-based persuasion in advertising: the impact of attractive pictures on verbal ad’s content

Abstract

Purpose The present study aims to further examine the persuasive effect of pictures in a print ad according to the recipient’s ability to process the information and to observe to what extent the presence of a picture could negatively influence recipients’ attitude toward the ad’s verbal claim. Design/methodology/approach Two studies were designed to manipulate the presence vs absence of an attractive/unattractive picture, the kind of verbal claims (affectively based vs rationally based) and the recipient’s ability to process the ad (cognitive load vs no cognitive load). Findings Main findings showed that the presence of an attractive picture elicited an unfavorable attitude toward the functional verbal claim when recipients were not cognitively charged. Furthermore, it proved to be a mediator of the influence of pictures on attitude toward the ad. The positive influence of an attractive picture on product evaluation and purchase intention was greater under a cognitive load but showed contrasting results for price perceptions. For the unattractive picture, cognitive load was found to be a moderator only when recipients had to infer the product price. Research limitations/implications The present research emphasized the negative influence of attractive pictures on functional verbal claims and the moderating role of cognitive load on pictorial stimuli either acting as peripheral or central cues in the persuasive process. Practical implications Practitioners may want to consider that an attractive picture in advertising is not always the best route for persuasion, especially when the verbal ad content emphasizes the product’s properties. Originality/value The present study provides new insights regarding the role of pictures in advertising persuasive effectiveness. Until now, no research had addressed the extent to which the presence of a picture could affect processing of an ad’s verbal claims. Additionally, the present study expands research on persuasive communication and affirms the necessity of more intensively investigating the role of pictures in advertising under the rubric of information processing level.

Do You Feel the Same as I Do? Differences in Virtual Reality Technology Experience and Acceptance Between Elderly Adults and College Students

“…Whitlark et al (1993) defined purchase intention as a purchase probability associated with an intention category at the percentage of individuals that would buy a product. Similar to a measure used in Kergoat et al (2017) , purchase intention was measured on a 5-point Likert scale two times ( Bearden et al, 1984 ), i.e., once before and once after people watched the video, by asking the participants to what extent they would like to purchase a VR headset, with 1 being “would like very much” and 5 being “would not like very much.”…”

The gateway bug to edible insect consumption: interactions between message framing, celebrity endorsement and online social support

“…This is because celebrity endorsers are confirmed to be more effective in terms of getting attention and penetrating through marketing clutters (Miciak and William, 1994). Research also finds that including attractive pictures in advertising can be a strong influence in the persuasive process as the image can improve processing fluency (Kergoat et al, 2017).…”

A Study on Green Advertising Effectiveness in the Perspective of Image Proximity

“…Many studies tend to explore how to increase the persuasion of green advertising (Nyilasy et al, 2013 ; Chang, 2015 ). In the field of print advertisement, picture and text are well-known to be two essential tools for advertising to deliver product information effectively, and previous studies further indicate that the picture can be more impressive instead of the text (MacInnis and Price, 1987 ; Scott, 1994 ; Pieters and Wedel, 2004 ; Kergoat et al, 2017 ). Past studies on advertising pictures are mainly divided into two categories: realistic images and unrealistic images (Kim B. K. et al, 2019 ).…”

“…Unrealistic images are defined as those seem similar to the real product images, but do not exist in the real world, for example, the organic food depiction by digital illustrations looks less attractive than the real organic food (Scott, 1994 ; Septianto et al, 2019 ). Although previous studies suggest that visual imagery is crucial to achieving effective advertising goal (Pieters and Wedel, 2004 ; Kergoat et al, 2017 ), limited studies have paid attention to visual imagery in green advertising.…”