2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2013047004782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pictorial health warnings on cigarette packs and the impact on women

Abstract: OBJECTIVETo analyze the association between the pictorial graphic health warnings on cigarette packs and their impact on intention to quit smoking among women.METHODSPopulation-based cross-sectional study among 265 women daily smokers in the State of Paraná in 2010. The sample size was calculated using cluster sampling. Participants were asked whether they had seen any pictorial graphic health warnings in the past 30 days, whether these warnings made them think about quitting, and intensity of these thoughts. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, there are a limited number of studies to test the FDA’s GHW labels to investigate the segmentation effect on cognitive outcomes among vulnerable populations. There are existing studies about interaction effects within different sub-populations, however these studies have primarily focused on the overall effects of GHW exposure without considering the issue of matching (Bittencourt, Person, Cruz, & Scarinci, 2013; Guillaumier, Bonevski, & Christine, 2015; Guillaumier, Bonevski, Paul, Durkin, & D’Este, 2014; Mead, Cohen, Kennedy, Gallo, & Latkin, 2016; Trasher et al, 2012). Our study looked at GHWs matched with the population, so that it can more clearly demonstrate segmentation effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, there are a limited number of studies to test the FDA’s GHW labels to investigate the segmentation effect on cognitive outcomes among vulnerable populations. There are existing studies about interaction effects within different sub-populations, however these studies have primarily focused on the overall effects of GHW exposure without considering the issue of matching (Bittencourt, Person, Cruz, & Scarinci, 2013; Guillaumier, Bonevski, & Christine, 2015; Guillaumier, Bonevski, Paul, Durkin, & D’Este, 2014; Mead, Cohen, Kennedy, Gallo, & Latkin, 2016; Trasher et al, 2012). Our study looked at GHWs matched with the population, so that it can more clearly demonstrate segmentation effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study provided the first evidence from an observational study that pictorial warnings on cigarette packs are effective in promoting quit attempts and helping smokers to quit smoking [ 40 ]. Health warnings in general, and pictorial ones in particular play an important role in the intention to quit smoking and quit attempts [ 41 ]. Pictorial warnings effectively increased intentions to quit, forgoing cigarettes, quit attempts, and successfully quitting smoking over 4 weeks [ 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PHW can have a different impact in different subgroups of the population, in terms of age, gender and educational group [33][34][35] . Unfortunately, with Google Trends data, we could not distinguish between such subgroups and we might therefore have missed specific effects for some subgroups.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%