2015
DOI: 10.4103/1817-1737.160365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pictorial essay of radiological features of benign intrathoracic masses

Abstract: With increased exposure of patients to routine imaging, incidental benign intrathoracic masses are frequently recognized. Most have classical imaging features, which are pathognomonic for their benignity. The aim of this pictorial review is to educate the reader of radiological features of several types of intrathoracic masses. The masses are categorized based on their location/origin and are grouped into parenchymal, pleural, mediastinal, or bronchial. Thoracic wall masses that invade the thorax such as neuro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 2 At careful revision of the pertinent literature, there aren’t reported specific radiological features of EH; generally, they appear as ovoid low-density endobronchial lesions, 3 with a smooth edge, focal fat, or fat alternating with calcific foci (popcorn calcification). 4 Such radiological findings appear substantially similar to those which may be found in BC tumors, 5 this making the differential diagnosis based on radiological features only extremely challenging, as in the present case.…”
Section: Commentsupporting
confidence: 74%
“… 2 At careful revision of the pertinent literature, there aren’t reported specific radiological features of EH; generally, they appear as ovoid low-density endobronchial lesions, 3 with a smooth edge, focal fat, or fat alternating with calcific foci (popcorn calcification). 4 Such radiological findings appear substantially similar to those which may be found in BC tumors, 5 this making the differential diagnosis based on radiological features only extremely challenging, as in the present case.…”
Section: Commentsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…There was no significant difference in general information between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients met the criteria for diagnosis and staging of silicosis ( 13 ). The cases were excluded due to pregnancy, lactation, other tumors, liver and kidney dysfunction, emphysema, pulmonary tuberculosis and other lung related diseases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central carcinoid tumors may be associated with a mucoid impaction [ 10 ]. A bronchocele, or mucoid impaction, is a common radiographic finding best characterized as tubular opacities, also known as the finger-in-glove sign [ 11 ]. Bronchoceles are most associated with benign neoplastic processes including lipomas, endobronchial hamartomas, and papillomatosis [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%