1984
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(84)85505-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Picosecond fluorescence study of the lifetimes of metalloporphyrin S1 and S2 states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lifetime of the S2 state was estimated to be 6 ps, which s comparable to that of the J-aggregate in aqueous solution. Up to now, only a few direct measurements of the lifetime of 52 state have been reported by using Streak camera and fluorescence up-conversion method [25][26][27]. The S2 lifetimes of 4.5 ps and < 2.5 ps were estimated for ruthenium and cadmium tetrabenzoporphyrins [26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lifetime of the S2 state was estimated to be 6 ps, which s comparable to that of the J-aggregate in aqueous solution. Up to now, only a few direct measurements of the lifetime of 52 state have been reported by using Streak camera and fluorescence up-conversion method [25][26][27]. The S2 lifetimes of 4.5 ps and < 2.5 ps were estimated for ruthenium and cadmium tetrabenzoporphyrins [26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, only a few direct measurements of the lifetime of 52 state have been reported by using Streak camera and fluorescence up-conversion method [25][26][27]. The S2 lifetimes of 4.5 ps and < 2.5 ps were estimated for ruthenium and cadmium tetrabenzoporphyrins [26]. The S2 lifetimes of ZnTPP in acetonitrile, dichloromethane, and ethanol were 3.5 ps, 0.75 ps, and 2.35 ps, respectively [25,27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). However, with respect to the summarized fluorescence properties (see Table 1 [5,9,29], the Q(0,0) fluorescence band of Lu(III) porphyrins should be slightly more intensive than that of Gd(III) porphyrins with respect to their Q(0,1) fluorescence bands. Therefore, one can expect that the Q(0,0) fluorescence band of Lu(III) porphyrins provides a majority of the overall S 1 →S 0 fluorescence intensity (however, from the studied species, this regularity concerns TBP and EP complexes only [1]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It facilitates a clear registration of fluorescence due to occurrence of relatively intensive bands. Secondly, according to the intensity ratio of Q(0,0) and Q(0,1) fluorescence bands of lanthanide TBP complexes[9,29], the Q(0,0) fluorescence band provides a majority of the overall S 1 →S 0 fluorescence intensity. Thirdly, fluorescence of metalloporphyrins based on TBP ligand is the least disturbed by fluorescence of free-base porphyrins(Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twophoton excitation spectroscopy was used to study the relationship between the efficiency of blue fluorescence from upper excited states (S 3,4 → S 0 for the free bases or S 2 → S 0 for metal complexes) and the position of even g-states of tetrapyrroles [87]. It is known that the quantum yield of blue S 2 → S 0 -fluorescence is determined by competition between the probability of radiative S 2 → S 0 -deactivation and the probability of radiationless internal S 2 → S 1 -conversion, which is the main channel for deactivation of the S 2 -state [88][89][90][91]. A possible explanation for the large differences in the probability of internal S 2 → S 1 -conversion was proposed based on quantum-chemical calculations using the PPDP/S method [59].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%