2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.81.155313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Picosecond charge variation of quantum dots under pulsed excitation

Abstract: We present a spectroscopic study of excitation dynamics in self assembled CdTe/ZnTe quantum dots. Insight into details of kinetics is obtained from the time resolved micro-photoluminescence, single photon correlation and subpicosecond excitation correlation measurements done on single quantum dots. It is shown that the pulsed excitation in energy above the energy gap of the barrier material results in separate capture of electrons and holes. The capture of carriers of different charge take place at different d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
28
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dominance of the in-plane emission of the dark exciton over the spin-flip process can be also independently ascertained by detailed analysis of the dynamics of the bright exciton recombination. Figure 4 initial populations of bright and dark states after an excitation pulse due to independent capture of electrons and holes under nonresonant excitation 7,17 (the integrals under fast and slow components appear to be different due to the semi-log scale of the plot). Zero-field lifetime of the dark exciton for this dot yielded 125 ± 20ns.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dominance of the in-plane emission of the dark exciton over the spin-flip process can be also independently ascertained by detailed analysis of the dynamics of the bright exciton recombination. Figure 4 initial populations of bright and dark states after an excitation pulse due to independent capture of electrons and holes under nonresonant excitation 7,17 (the integrals under fast and slow components appear to be different due to the semi-log scale of the plot). Zero-field lifetime of the dark exciton for this dot yielded 125 ± 20ns.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the limit of the low excitation power each QD gives only a few intense lines (Figs. 6 and 7): neutral exciton line (X) and one or two trion lines (X + and/or X − ) 17 . This allows us to estimate the number of emitting dots per area of the laser spot, and consequently, the QDs density.…”
Section: Microphotoluminescence Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sign of this feature was correlated with the charge state of the QD: average QD charge state was more negative for short delays. The feature was recognized as an effect of different trapping dynamics of electrons and holes [12]. We assumed that the asymmetry between carriers of different signs can be modelled as a difference in the values of carrier capture decay time between electrons and holes.…”
Section: Non-resonant Excitationmentioning
confidence: 99%