2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2008.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pico hydro – Reducing technical risks for rural electrification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
34
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, a World Bank study in 2006 showed that pico-hydropower is the most competitive offgrid power technology on a levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) basis ($/kWh), as shown in Fig. 1 [3,4]. In Rwanda for example, the national utility retail price for electricity in 2009 was $0.24/kWh [5], yet pico-hydro is estimated to cost less than $0.20/kWh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a World Bank study in 2006 showed that pico-hydropower is the most competitive offgrid power technology on a levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) basis ($/kWh), as shown in Fig. 1 [3,4]. In Rwanda for example, the national utility retail price for electricity in 2009 was $0.24/kWh [5], yet pico-hydro is estimated to cost less than $0.20/kWh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hoque N. and Kumar S. analyzed the composition, layout and effectiveness of home solar systems for proving electric energy for residents living in remote areas in Bangladesh [27]. Williams A. and Simpson R. explored the technical requirements, successful experiences and influencing factors of electricity provision for British residents in remote areas using small hydropower [28]. Saheb-Koussa D. et al investigated the technological economy of a wind-photovoltaic-diesel hybrid power system by which the rural residents can access electricity in Algeria, and the optimal composition of a wind-solar-oil hybrid power system was also studied [29].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy source and distribution options implemented in each project depend on the available resources and the structure of the community. In general, when water resource is sufficient, PA always considers the microhydro power as the first option , since these systems are usually the lowest cost option for off-grid rural electrification (Coello et al, 2006;Kaygusuz, 2011;REN21, 2008;Williams and Simpson, 2009), are reliable for off-grid systems (van Els et al, 2012), and the energy is continuously available (Drinkwaard et al, 2010), . If water resource is not available, photovoltaic (PV) or wind systems are used, depending on resource availability, as their suitable to provide decentralized electrical service to rural households (Bugaje, 2006;Jacobson, 2007;Hiremath, 2009;Kandpal, 2010a, 2010b;Ferrer-Martí et al, 2012;Valer et al, 2014).…”
Section: Description Of the Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%