2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2203.09559
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Picard rank jumps for K3 surfaces with bad reduction

Abstract: Let X be a K3 surface over a number field. We prove that X has infinitely many specializations where its Picard rank jumps, hence extending our previous work with Shankar-Shankar-Tang to the case where X might have potentially bad reduction. We prove a similar result for generically ordinary non-isotrivial families of K3 surfaces over curves over F p which extends previous work of Maulik-Shankar-Tang. As a consequence, we give a new proof of the ordinary Hecke orbit conjecture for orthogonal and unitary Shimur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let Υ be a toroidal stratum representative of type II , B Υ the corresponding boundary component of type II and we assume in this section that that boundary point S (F P ) lies in B Υ (F p ). Then by [Tay22], we have Combining Equation (6.2.1) and the previous estimate, we get Proposition 3.9 in the type II case. Combining the two previous estimates concludes the proof of Proposition 3.9 in the type III case.…”
Section: Non-archimedean Estimatessupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Let Υ be a toroidal stratum representative of type II , B Υ the corresponding boundary component of type II and we assume in this section that that boundary point S (F P ) lies in B Υ (F p ). Then by [Tay22], we have Combining Equation (6.2.1) and the previous estimate, we get Proposition 3.9 in the type II case. Combining the two previous estimates concludes the proof of Proposition 3.9 in the type III case.…”
Section: Non-archimedean Estimatessupporting
confidence: 53%
“…We introduce in this section Arakelov Chow groups following [GS90] and [BBK07]. For more details on this section, we also refer to [SSTT22, §3.1] and [Tay22,§3]. Let (rL, Q) ⊂ (L, Q) be an inclusion of quadratic lattices of signature (n, 2) as before, in particular L is maximal with discriminant coprime to r. Let M r , M be the normal integral models over Z of the GSpin Shimura varieties associated to (rL, Q) and (L, Q) constructed in the previous section.…”
Section: We Also Have An Inclusion Of Filtered Vector Bundles With In...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We should mention that the assumption of potentially good reduction in the above statements has been removed recently by one of the authors in [Tay22] so that all the above results hold unconditionally.…”
Section: Exceptional Splitting Of Abelian Varietiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Indeed, our idea is a crucial ingredient in proving intersection-theoretic results in characteristic p, as well as in proving the ordinary Hecke-orbit conjecture for GSpin Shimura varieties (see [MST22]). It has also been used to extend the main theorem to the bad reduction situation; see [Tay22]. We note, however, that our theorem applies to K3 surfaces with potentially good reduction everywhere.…”
Section: Strategy Of the Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%