2013
DOI: 10.1007/s40295-015-0061-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Picard Iteration, Chebyshev Polynomials and Chebyshev-Picard Methods: Application in Astrodynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(5) Analysis using Fourier bases. (6) Accuracy analysis of number of basis functions versus points distribution. (7) Extension to nonlinear DEs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) Analysis using Fourier bases. (6) Accuracy analysis of number of basis functions versus points distribution. (7) Extension to nonlinear DEs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section focuses on investigating the convergence characteristics of the JPI method. Similar to the CPI method and its modification, the convergence domain of the JPI method is different from the classical Picard iteration method due to the accumulation of round‐off error and approximation error based on the truncated Jacobi series of order N during the iterations. Here, based on the idea in Bai, we show that the convergence of the JPI method is not generally guaranteed, but we can provide a suitable condition to achieve it.…”
Section: Convergence Investigation Of the Jpi Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark In the MCPI method and its applications, the original problem on the interval [ a , b ] is transformed to an equivalent problem on the interval [−1,1], and it may complicate the structure of the IVPs especially in higher order problems. To overcome this difficulty, we employed the shifted Jacobi polynomials on interval [ a , b ] instead of transforming the problem to the interval [−1,1].…”
Section: Vector‐matrix Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where s = √ r 2 + z 2 , and γ r ,γ θ ,γ z are the acceleration components in cylindrical coordinate systems. These general trajectory equations of motion are vastly used in many spacecraft trajectory optimization problems [45], specifically for analyzing perturbed orbits [46] and low-thrust transfers [47]. Although the Cartesian and cylindrical forms are often used for typical spacecraft trajectory optimization problems [48], other forms based on the variation of parameters are sometimes used in spacecraft trajectory optimization.…”
Section: Inertial Coordinatesmentioning
confidence: 99%