Piaget's Theory

Beilin, Harry; Pufall, Peter B.

doi:10.4324/9780203763155

Cited by 43 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Note of course that 'genetic' here means 'genesis' rather than 'related to genes' (Burman, 2012b: 285, n. 1; see also Burman, 2019;Burman, Bazar, and Weizmann, 2020). And note too that the theoretical changes made after the popularization have been referred to not only as 'Piaget's new theory' (Beilin, 1992;pace Smith, 2017), but also-to draw attention to his updated biological meta-theory-as 'epigenetic epistemology' (Burman, 2013(Burman, , 2016. 10.…”

Section: Orcid Idmentioning

confidence: 99%

On Kuhn’s case, and Piaget’s: A critical two-sited hauntology (or, On impact without reference)

Burman

2020

History of the Human Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Picking up on John Forrester’s (1949–2015) disclosure that he felt ‘haunted’ by the suspicion that Thomas Kuhn’s (1922–96) interests had become his own, this essay complexifies our understanding of both of their legacies by presenting two sites for that haunting. The first is located by engaging Forrester’s argument that the connection between Kuhn and psychoanalysis was direct. (This was the supposed source of his historiographical method: ‘climbing into other people’s heads’.) However, recent archival discoveries suggest that that is incorrect. Instead, Kuhn’s influence in this regard was Jean Piaget (1896–1980). And it is Piaget’s thinking that was influenced directly by psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis then haunts Kuhn’s thinking through Piaget, and thus Piaget haunts Forrester through Kuhn. To better understand this second site of the haunting—which is ultimately the more important one, given the intent of this special issue—Piaget’s early psychoanalytic ideas are uncovered through their interaction with his early biology and subsequent turn to philosophy. But several layers of conflicting contemporary misunderstandings are first excavated. The method of hauntology is also developed, taking advantage of its origins as a critical response to the psychoanalytic discourse. As a result of adopting this approach, a larger than usual number of primary sources have been unearthed and presented as evidence (including new translations from French originals). Where those influences have continued to have an impact, but their sources forgotten, they have thus been returned. They can then all be considered together in deriving new perspectives of Forrester’s cases/Kuhn’s exemplars/Piaget’s stages.

show abstract

Section: Orcid Idmentioning

confidence: 99%

On Kuhn’s case, and Piaget’s: A critical two-sited hauntology (or, On impact without reference)

Burman

2020

History of the Human Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The two research programmes inaugurated at the start of this period ended in 1955 and 1962, respectively, and both had a significant impact on the outward spread of Genevan psychology during the 1960s. Indeed, the results of the programme in genetic structuralismby then recast as the much broader 'genetic epistemology' (which was itself also later updated [Beilin, 1992])had a global impact, especially during the resurgence in American interest in Piaget's work as part of the widespread education reforms after Sputnik (see e.g., Bliss, 1995;Herman & Ripple, 2002;Hsueh, 2005;also Müller, Burman, & Hutchison, 2013). Although Piaget had already been known to Americans as a methodologist, he thus also came to be seen as a 'theorist' (see Bruner, 1983, pp.…”

Section: Parallel Developmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Los dos programas de investigación inaugurados al inicio de este período finalizaron en 1955 y 1962, respectivamente, y ambos tuvieron un impacto significativo en la propagación externa de la psicología de Ginebra durante la década de 1960. En realidad, los resultados del programa de estructuralismo genético, por aquel entonces reestructurado en el campo más amplio de la 'epistemología genética' (que fue a su vez posteriormente actualizado [Beilin, 1992]) tuvo un impacto global, especialmente durante el resurgimiento del interés americano por el trabajo de Piaget como parte de las reformas educativas generalizadas que se realizaron después de Sputnik (ver por ejemplo Bliss, 1995;Herman & Ripple, 2002;Hsueh, 2005;también Müller, Burman, & Hutchinson, 2013). A pesar de que Piaget ya era conocido por los americanos como un experto en metodología, también comenzó a ser considerado como un 'teórico ' (ver Bruner, 1983, pp.…”

Section: Desarrollos Paralelosunclassified

The mobile frontiers of Piaget’s psychology. From academic tourism to interdisciplinary collaboration /Las fronteras móviles de la psicología de Piaget. Del turismo académico a la colaboración interdisciplinaria

Ratcliff

Burman

2017

Estudios de Psicología

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although Piaget and Turkle refer to children, similar patterns could also occur in adults who are confronted with a new object, such as artificial agents 2. Complex levels of knowledge organizations in which schemes are combined.…”

mentioning

confidence: 95%

The Ontological Classification of Conversational Agents

Etzrodt

2021

Chatbot Research and Design

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper focuses on the attributed nature of the voicebased agents Alexa and Google Assistant in conversational contexts. Using Piaget's equilibration theory, enhanced by Hubbard's concept of personhood the paper considers how people categorize voice-based agents along a thing-person spectrum and whether this categorization reflects assimilation or accommodation of these technologies. The results of two studies (a hypothetical conversation with the agent via an online-survey, N = 1288, and a real conversation with the agent, N = 105) are indicating a modified classification towards personified things, which is reinforced by younger age and a higher quality of interaction. Implications, limitations, and further research regarding a more detailed classification of conversational agents are discussed.

show abstract

Piaget's Theory

Cited by 43 publications

References 0 publications

On Kuhn’s case, and Piaget’s: A critical two-sited hauntology (or, On impact without reference)

On Kuhn’s case, and Piaget’s: A critical two-sited hauntology (or, On impact without reference)

The mobile frontiers of Piaget’s psychology. From academic tourism to interdisciplinary collaboration /Las fronteras móviles de la psicología de Piaget. Del turismo académico a la colaboración interdisciplinaria

The Ontological Classification of Conversational Agents

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About