2005
DOI: 10.21000/jasmr05010791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phytostabilization of Acid Metalliferous Mine Tailings at the Keating Site in Montana

Abstract: Abstract. The Keating Tailings site is located in Broadwater County, Montana on land administered by the Bureau of Land Management. These low pH (4 standard units) wastes resulting from historic gold and copper mining operations contain phytotoxic levels of several metals and are generally devoid of vegetation.With an estimated volume of 110,100 m 3 , these tailings represent unacceptable risk to the environment and human health. The objective of conducting a phytostabilization study at the Keating Tailings Si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2003, the mining industry produced 18 billion cubic metres of waste worldwide, and the quantity was projected to double after 20 to 30 years because of mining of lower grade ore (Aswathanaryana, 2003). The effect of mine dumps on flora and fauna is twofold: deposition leads to complete burial and loss of biological diversity on site (Neuman et al, 2005;Shukla, Lal, & Ebinger, 2005;Young, 1988), and there are off-site effects because of transportation of pollutants (Winter & Redente, 2002;Conesa, Faz, & Arnaldos, 2007a;Mendez & Maier, 2008). Specifically, mine dumps cause deterioration of aesthetics, reduction in land productivity, changes in topography, destruction of habitats and increased wind and water erosion and air, soil and water pollution (Martín-Moreno et al, 2016;Mukhopadhyay et al, 2013;Tizado & Núñez-Pérez, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2003, the mining industry produced 18 billion cubic metres of waste worldwide, and the quantity was projected to double after 20 to 30 years because of mining of lower grade ore (Aswathanaryana, 2003). The effect of mine dumps on flora and fauna is twofold: deposition leads to complete burial and loss of biological diversity on site (Neuman et al, 2005;Shukla, Lal, & Ebinger, 2005;Young, 1988), and there are off-site effects because of transportation of pollutants (Winter & Redente, 2002;Conesa, Faz, & Arnaldos, 2007a;Mendez & Maier, 2008). Specifically, mine dumps cause deterioration of aesthetics, reduction in land productivity, changes in topography, destruction of habitats and increased wind and water erosion and air, soil and water pollution (Martín-Moreno et al, 2016;Mukhopadhyay et al, 2013;Tizado & Núñez-Pérez, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Establishing native vegetation on acid mine lands will reduce wind and water erosion and decrease contaminant leaching into sub-surface waters. Successful revegetation has been accomplished at great expense by extensive amendment of the degraded soils with lime and organic materials, or by use of cover-soils (Dollhopf et al, 1998;Jennings and Neuman, 2006, Massey, 2006, Massey and Thompson, 2006, Munshower et al, 2003, Neuman et al, 2005, Prodgers, 2003, Prodgers, 2006. However, for the most part, plant cover and species diversity remains low on many sites even though some revegetation efforts (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a need for locally-adapted native plants which are tolerant of very low soil pH and elevated heavy metal concentrations to revegetate these acid mine lands in the Rocky Mountain west ( Jennings and Neuman, 2006;Neuman et al, 2005). Large numbers of acid and heavy metal tolerant (AHMT) plants are necessary because of the immense area of acid mine land that needs to be reclaimed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%