2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phytoremediation of agriculture runoff by filamentous algae poly-culture for biomethane production, and nutrient recovery for secondary cultivation of lipid generating microalgae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Removal rates of phosphate (0.033 g m −2 d −1 ), nitrate (0.19 g m −2 d −1 ), and ammonia (0.14 g m −2 d −1 ) were low given the relatively low initial concentrations of the floways. These nutrient removal rates were comparable to the values reported for algal turf scrubber R systems (Bohutskyi et al, 2016a), but lower than the values observed in high rate algal ponds (Park and Craggs, 2010;Gutiérrez et al, 2016) and verticalalgal-biofilm enhanced raceway ponds (Zhang et al, 2018c). In the initial portion of the experiment, nitrate concentrations increased while ammonia concentrations declined.…”
Section: Cultivation and Composition Of Filamentous Algal Biomasssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Removal rates of phosphate (0.033 g m −2 d −1 ), nitrate (0.19 g m −2 d −1 ), and ammonia (0.14 g m −2 d −1 ) were low given the relatively low initial concentrations of the floways. These nutrient removal rates were comparable to the values reported for algal turf scrubber R systems (Bohutskyi et al, 2016a), but lower than the values observed in high rate algal ponds (Park and Craggs, 2010;Gutiérrez et al, 2016) and verticalalgal-biofilm enhanced raceway ponds (Zhang et al, 2018c). In the initial portion of the experiment, nitrate concentrations increased while ammonia concentrations declined.…”
Section: Cultivation and Composition Of Filamentous Algal Biomasssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Treatment technologies using algae to remove nutrients from wastewater hold promise as a more sustainable alternative to traditional wastewater treatment (Park et al, 2011;Bohutskyi et al, 2015bBohutskyi et al, , 2016b. While there are numerous methods for growing algae in wastewater (Prajapati et al, 2013), filamentous algal treatment systems are easy to harvest and dewater, operate under a broad range of environmental conditions, reduce nutrients to low concentrations, and produce large quantities of renewable biomass (Adey et al, 2011;Bohutskyi et al, 2016a). Indeed, algal turf scrubbers R can be used to treat aquatic ecosystems, contaminated groundwater, municipal sewage, and industrial/agricultural wastewater (Adey et al, 2011;Bohutskyi et al, 2016a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 5. Bioremediation data (in mMol L −1 ) from literature [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] and from this current study, presenting efficiency of nutrient uptake by algal cultivation, compared with struvite nutrient recovery, HRAP and ATS. Due to the considerable volumes and flow rates involved in the wastewater industry, systems tend to be large-scale.…”
Section: Waste Remediationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In specific, nitrogen removal efficiencies in synthetic and horticultural wastewater were 59-99% and 20-86%, respectively. However, there was a significant difference in phosphorus removal due to chemical precipitation of phosphorus in horticultural wastewater (Liu et al, 2016) Bohutskyi et al (2016). remove nutrients in agricultural storm water by ATS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%