Phytoremediation of 1,4-Dioxane-Containing Recovered Groundwater

Ferro, Ari M.; Kennedy, Jean; LaRue, James C

doi:10.1080/15226514.2012.687018

Cited by 21 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 24 publications

(27 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, 1,4-dioxane was applied to a phytoremediation test plot, but only 18% could be recovered compared to 86% recovery of a bromide tracer. 71 The loss of 1,4-dioxane was attributed to phytovolatilization, although no direct evidence was provided. Note that direct phytovolatilization rates are not directly comparable, as many factors affect the rate of phytovolatilization.…”

Section: ■ Transport Of Gases In Plantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Phytovolatilization of Organic Contaminants

Limmer

Burken

2016

Environ. Sci. Technol.

210

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Plants can interact with a variety of organic compounds, and thereby affect the fate and transport of many environmental contaminants. Volatile organic compounds may be volatilized from stems or leaves (direct phytovolatilization) or from soil due to plant root activities (indirect phytovolatilization). Fluxes of contaminants volatilizing from plants are important across scales ranging from local contaminant spills to global fluxes of methane emanating from ecosystems biochemically reducing organic carbon. In this article past studies are reviewed to clearly differentiate between direct- and indirect-phytovolatilization and we discuss the plant physiology driving phytovolatilization in different ecosystems. Current measurement techniques are also described, including common difficulties in experimental design. We also discuss reports of phytovolatilization in the literature, finding that compounds with low octanol-air partitioning coefficients are more likely to be phytovolatilized (log KOA < 5). Reports of direct phytovolatilization at field sites compare favorably to model predictions. Finally, future research needs are presented that could better quantify phytovolatilization fluxes at field scale.

show abstract

Section: ■ Transport Of Gases In Plantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Phytovolatilization of Organic Contaminants

Limmer

Burken

2016

Environ. Sci. Technol.

210

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Studies have been carried out also on some other volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such as 1,4-dioxane. It has been found that dioxane (2.5 μg/L) was effectively removed by using phytovolatilization (Ferro et al 2013 ).…”

Section: Phytovolatilizationmentioning

confidence: 98%

Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals: The Use of Green Approaches to Clean the Environment

Singh

Santal

2015

Phytoremediation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Phytoremediation is considered a more sustainable technology because it can use locally available plants and trees to remediate contaminants and requires little energy to operate. Pilot‐scale studies have been conducted and demonstrate promise in the adsorption of 1,4‐dioxane from groundwater into the plants and subsequent transpiration via leaves (Aitchison et al., ; Ferro et al., ). Full‐scale systems are also in use.…”

Section: Overview Of Sustainability Drivers By Technologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable Remediation Considerations for Treatment of 1,4‐Dioxane in Groundwater

Favara¹,

Tunks²,

Hatton³

et al. 2016

Remediation Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

1,4‐Dioxane remediation is challenging due to its physiochemical properties and low target treatment levels. As such, applications of traditional remediation technologies have proven ineffective. There are a number of promising remediation technologies that could potentially be scaled for successful application to groundwater restoration. Sustainable remediation is an important consideration in the evaluation of remediation technologies. It is critically important to consider sustainability when new technologies are being applied or new contaminants are being treated with traditional technologies. There are a number of social, economic, and environmental drivers that should be considered when implementing 1,4‐dioxane treatment technologies. This includes evaluating sustainability externalities by considering the cradle‐to‐grave impacts of the chemicals, energy, processes, transportation, and materials used in groundwater treatment. It is not possible to rate technologies as more or less sustainable because each application is context specific. However, by including sustainability thinking into technology evaluations and implementation plans, decisions makers can be more informed and the results of remediation are likely to be more effective and beneficial. There are a number sustainable remediation frameworks, guidance documents, footprint assessment tools, life cycle assessment tools, and best management practices that can be utilized for these purposes. This paper includes an overview describing the importance of sustainability in technology selection, identifies sustainability impacts related to technologies that can be used to treat 1,4‐dioxane, provides an approximating approach to assess sustainability impacts, and summarizes potential sustainability impacts related to promising treatment technologies. ©2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

show abstract

Phytoremediation of 1,4-Dioxane-Containing Recovered Groundwater

Cited by 21 publications

References 24 publications

Phytovolatilization of Organic Contaminants

Phytovolatilization of Organic Contaminants

Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals: The Use of Green Approaches to Clean the Environment

Sustainable Remediation Considerations for Treatment of 1,4‐Dioxane in Groundwater

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About