1998
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/20.6.1099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phytoplankton spring blooms in the southern Baltic Sea—spatio-temporal development and long-term trends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
111
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
111
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The strong peak in the surface layer of the oxic zone probably represents contributions from phototrophic dinoflagellates. Plausible candidates are Peridiniella catenata and Scrippsiella hangoei, both of which are involved in the spring phytoplankton blooms in the central Baltic Sea (Wasmund et al, 1998;Höglander et al, 2004). The latter species was previously reported to produce dinosterol (Leblond et al, 2007).…”
Section: Phototrophic Vs Heterotrophic Dinoflagellates and Ciliatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strong peak in the surface layer of the oxic zone probably represents contributions from phototrophic dinoflagellates. Plausible candidates are Peridiniella catenata and Scrippsiella hangoei, both of which are involved in the spring phytoplankton blooms in the central Baltic Sea (Wasmund et al, 1998;Höglander et al, 2004). The latter species was previously reported to produce dinosterol (Leblond et al, 2007).…”
Section: Phototrophic Vs Heterotrophic Dinoflagellates and Ciliatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowest content of carbohydrates and glycogen was observed in GG and VM from summer to winter. A large increase in carbohydrates and glycogen was noted at both sites in spring, which can be associated with the phytoplankton bloom (Pliński 1995, Wasmund et al 1998. It means that good trophic conditions delivered enough carbohydrates as a source of immediate energy for basic physiological processes, but also for the development of gonads in females, as they are converted into lipids in the oocytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming an N and P demand for primary production according to the Redfield ratio (N:P = 16), the winter DIN: DIP ratio is traditionally used to assess the limiting nutrient (Table 18.2). While the spring communities in the Kattegat (Granéli 1987;Granéli et al 1990), the Baltic Proper (Granéli et al 1990;Wasmund et al 1998), the central Gulf of Finland and the Bothnian Sea are generally N limited (Tamminen and Andersen 2007), P limitation prevails in the Bothnian Bay (Tamminen and Andersen 2007). In the proximity of freshwater sources, limitation patterns can change spatially and interannually, depending on run-off (Pitkänen and Tamminen 1995;Seppälä et al 1999;Tamminen and Seppälä 1999;Yurkovskis 2004).…”
Section: Carbon Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engel et al 2002;Nausch et al 2004;Kangro et al 2007;Larsson 2007, 2010). However, lower C:P ratios are also observed in cases where a PO 4 excess with regard to the Redfield N:P ratio exists in the nutrient pool (Wasmund et al 1998). Therefore, the amount of C formed per unit N or P available to producers varies, which further influences C sedimentation and O 2 consumption in sediments and bottom waters.…”
Section: Carbon Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%