Phytoplankton response to nutrient enrichment in an urbanized estuary: Apparent inhibition of primary production by overeutrophication

Abstract

Phytoplankton response to nutrients was examined with a 26-yr database from the Delaware Estuary. Biomassnormalized primary production did not increase linearly with increasing nutrient concentrations and instead showed saturation at comparatively low nutrient concentrations and decreased at high concentrations. To separate the effects of light availability and temperature on primary production from those of other environmental variables, we developed an empirical model of areal primary production. The model equation was obtained for the entire dataset and the effect of the residual variables was expressed as correction factors of observed primary production to the model estimates. The model accounted for 67% of variability of observed primary production overall, indicating that production of the estuary was mainly controlled by light availability and temperature. In contrast, a similar model applied to a Chesapeake Bay database had shown a poorer fit, indicating consistent light limitation in the Delaware Estuary and varying strengths of light and nutrient limitation in the Chesapeake Bay. The relationships between nutrients and correction factors for the Delaware Estuary showed that the model underestimates primary production at low and mid nutrient concentrations and overestimates it at high concentrations. The model fit and correction factors for five regions of the estuary indicate a high-nutrient, low-growth situation in the Delaware Estuary because of varying influences of light limitation, proportions of nutrients, and probably toxic contaminants in areas with large anthropogenic inputs-including high nutrients.Much of the classical thinking about eutrophication has arisen from lake studies. In lake systems, a relatively simple model appeared to successfully describe phytoplankton response to the effect of a single limiting nutrient, phosphate (Hutchinson 1969). In estuaries, early evaluation of eutrophication was made by Ketchum (1969) and was popularized by Jaworski in the Potomac River (Jaworski et al. 1972). During the evolution of conceptual models of estuarine eutrophication, cautions about oversimplification of this problem have been made for a number of years (e.g., Schindler 1981;Nixon and Pilson 1983;Vollenweider et al. 1992). However, there is still a tendency to think of eutrophication in estuarine waters in terms of a simple linear response to a single limiting nutrient: what Cloern (2001) has described as a Phase I model. To construct more complex models, Cloern addresses system-specific responses; complex ge-1 Corresponding author (kyoshi@udel.edu). AcknowledgmentsNumerous graduate students, research associates, and postdoctoral researchers, as well as many undergraduate and high school student volunteers, have assisted over the years; we thank all of them for their contributions. We also thank James E. Cloern and two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on the manuscript.

Estuarine oxygen dynamics: What can we learn about hypoxia from long‐time records in the Delaware Estuary?

“…Dissolved nutrient concentrations in the river are high during the entire year and are regularly diluted down the salinity gradient to low values at the bay mouth, where they reach almost zero in the spring (Sharp et al 2009). The maximum primary production in the estuary occurs in the mid-bay region around 30-50 km from the mouth of the bay in all seasons (Pennock and Sharp 1994;Yoshiyama and Sharp 2006).…”

“…Chlorophyll concentration, depth-integrated areal production (APROD) estimates, and maximum production per volume normalized to chlorophyll biomass (P : B) were used as metrics (Yoshiyama and Sharp 2006). For evaluation in this paper, P : B and APROD were used.…”

Short-term response of phytoplankton community to over-enrichment of nutrients in a well-preserved sub-tropical estuary

“…Rivers, since humans usually use them as wastewater disposal systems, also play an important role in the nutrient enrichment of coastal waters and estuaries (SMITH, 2003). The first eutrophication associated processes that is focused on in almost all studies is the excess algal growth (YOSHIYAMA; SHARP, 2006). But, as estuarine system response to nutrient enrichment has been demonstrated not to be linear, as i.e.…”

“…But, as estuarine system response to nutrient enrichment has been demonstrated not to be linear, as i.e. the high-nutrient and low-growth (HNLG) conditions described by (SHARP, 2001 apud YOSHIYAMA;SHARP, 2006), other indicators of eutrophication should be considered. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that in over-enriched waters primary production is depressed due to several factors such as light limitation and toxic contaminants (YOSHIYAMA;SHARP, 2006).…”

“…the high-nutrient and low-growth (HNLG) conditions described by (SHARP, 2001 apud YOSHIYAMA;SHARP, 2006), other indicators of eutrophication should be considered. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that in over-enriched waters primary production is depressed due to several factors such as light limitation and toxic contaminants (YOSHIYAMA;SHARP, 2006). However, few studies have focused on the changes in phytoplankton community composition in estuarine waters as a response to nutrient enrichment (i.e.…”