2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phytoplankton community responses in a shallow lake following lanthanum-bentonite application

Abstract: Contact CEH NORA team at noraceh@ceh.ac.ukThe NERC and CEH trademarks and logos ('the Trademarks') are registered trademarks of NERC in the UK and other countries, and may not be used without the prior written consent of the Trademark owner. The release of phosphorus (P) from bed sediments to the overlying water can delay , 2012;Spears et al., 2012;Sharpley et al., 2014). (over 3 days, as slurry from a pontoon) to control internal P loading, in an effort to Loch Flemington (Table 1) and likewise, being sha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result contrasts with some studies that showed a rapid decline in phytoplankton abundance, yet they combined a coagulant with LMB as ballast, effectively clearing the water column [20,65]. Other studies used only LMB and also reported a decline or control of cyanobacteria [61], or a short-lived positive effect [19], but no information on the speed of the response, while in another study a clear lag period of several months was observed [66]. In our study, the increase in cyanobacteria in controls and sole LMB treatments after one month does not seem to be caused by recruitment of settled cyanobacteria as a similar phenomenon should have then occurred in the dredged enclosures.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result contrasts with some studies that showed a rapid decline in phytoplankton abundance, yet they combined a coagulant with LMB as ballast, effectively clearing the water column [20,65]. Other studies used only LMB and also reported a decline or control of cyanobacteria [61], or a short-lived positive effect [19], but no information on the speed of the response, while in another study a clear lag period of several months was observed [66]. In our study, the increase in cyanobacteria in controls and sole LMB treatments after one month does not seem to be caused by recruitment of settled cyanobacteria as a similar phenomenon should have then occurred in the dredged enclosures.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Therefore, primary production is a more probable explanation for the observed increase in pH in these treatments. This is unexpected as sufficient reduction of SRP by LMB can strongly hamper algal growth, as evidenced in laboratory experiments [15] and whole-lake applications [19,61], yet there are also reports that algal growth was not inhibited after LMB application [62]. Both an insufficient reduction in SRP and potential luxury consumption of P by the cyanobacteria are possible explanations for continued primary production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Loch Flemington, which is explained by the less competitive advantage of cyanobacteria under reduced phosphorus conditions (Lang et al, 2016). Similar results are also found in shallow reservoir in California and marine cyanobacteria removal by polyaluminium chloride modified clay (Yu et al, 1995).…”
Section: Lang Et Al Reported the Decreasing Cyanobacteria After Phossupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Most of the previous research on phosphorus inactive materials has highlighted the performance of phosphorus fixation or immobilization Wagenhoff et al, 2012). Recently, their impacts on phytoplankton abundance and community structure are getting more attentions to be considered in eutrophic water restoration actions Lang et al, 2016;. Although our study aims to answer these questions, the laboratory-scale experiment cannot simulate the field reality where the phosphorus cycle and phytoplankton community are affected by numerous environmental factors .…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It was hypothesized that the phosphorus-sensitive cyanobacteria were significantly affected by low phosphorus pressure [42]. Lang et al [43] and Su et al [44] reported that the number of cyanobacteria decreased due to the less competitive advantage of cyanobacteria under reduced phosphorus conditions after the removal of phosphorus in shallow water. In this study, the reduction of cyanobacteria was also more sensitive than Chlorophyta (Figure 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%