Phytopathogenic infection alters rice–pest–parasitoid tri‐trophic interactions

Abstract

BACKGROUND Plant pathogens and pests often occur together, causing damage while interfering with plant growth. The effects of phytopathogenic infections on plant–herbivore–natural enemy tri‐trophic interactions (TTIs) have been extensively investigated, but little is known about how the interval of infection influences such relationships. Here, the effect of rice plants infected by the phytopathogen Rhizoctonia solani on the herbivorous rice brown planthopper (BPH) and associated egg parasitoid Anagrus nilaparvatae over a temporal scale was examined. RESULTS Our results showed that rice plants infected by R. solani showed increased volatile profiles and significantly attracted BPH and A. nilaparvatae at 5–15 days post infection (DPI) and 5–10 DPI, respectively, when compared with healthy plants. Jasmonic acid and salicylic acid content decreased significantly in BPH‐damaged plants after 15 DPI, whereas oxalic acid accumulated soon after 5 DPI when compared with healthy plants. To adapt to adverse environment, BPH laid more eggs and developed into macropterous adults. Under field conditions, R. solani infection had no substantial effect on the arthropod community when compared with healthy plants. CONCLUSION Taken together, R. solani infection altered rice–pest–parasitoid TTIs over a temporal scale. This result will shed more light on our understanding of plant pathogen–insect cross‐talk essential for developing novel pest management strategies. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.

Exogenous ABA promotes resistance to Sitobion avenae (Fabricius) in rice seedlings

“…In order to mitigate herbivore damage, plants have developed and evolved a considerable variety of unique physical and chemical defensive strategies to directly or indirectly thwart and escape insect attacks 14–17 . Direct defense mechanisms include fortifying the plant epidermis and producing toxic secondary metabolites that suppress herbivore activity or growth.…”

“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] In order to mitigate herbivore damage, plants have developed and evolved a considerable variety of unique physical and chemical defensive strategies to directly or indirectly thwart and escape insect attacks. [14][15][16][17] Direct defense mechanisms include fortifying the plant epidermis and producing toxic secondary metabolites that suppress herbivore activity or growth. Previous studies have demonstrated the role of defensive enzymes such as peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) in regulating rice resistance to sucking and piercing insect pests.…”

Bio-Efficacy of Chrysoeriol7, a Natural Chemical and Repellent, against Brown Planthopper in Rice

“…BPH sucks leaf sheath, reduces nutrients in plants, destroys tissues through its spawn, impedes nutrient migration, and causes plant colonization. Depending on the growing stage of rice, the resistance against BPH is at different levels, reducing the tiller number and 1000-grain weight, and having a negative effect on yield and grain quality [4,5]. The control of BPH is predominantly achieved by means of synthetic pesticides [6].…”