2006
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcl207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phytolith Assemblages and Systematic Associations in Grassland Species of the South-Eastern Pampean Plains, Argentina

Abstract: The study provides a reference collection of phytolith assemblages of the main Poaceae and Asteraceae species of Paspalum quadrifarium grassland and describes some phytolith morphotypes/systematic relationships useful for the analysis of fossil phytolith assemblages of the Pampean region.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, silica skeletons were also observed, being composed of cone and elongate phytoliths (6.1%), psilate elongate phytoliths (2.8%), stellate cells (0.9%), stomatal complexes and paralellepipedal psilate cells (0.9%), subepidermal cells (0.5%); and isolated stomatal complexes (2.35%) (Figure 7.1B). This description is in agreement with previous reports on the Cyperaceae family, in which it is classified as a silica accumulator (PIPERNO, 1988), and the cones are described as the phytolith diagnostic morphotype at family level (PIPERNO, 1988;FERNÁNDEZ HONAINE et al, 2009).…”
Section: Phytoliths From Plants A) Halophile-psamophile Communitysupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, silica skeletons were also observed, being composed of cone and elongate phytoliths (6.1%), psilate elongate phytoliths (2.8%), stellate cells (0.9%), stomatal complexes and paralellepipedal psilate cells (0.9%), subepidermal cells (0.5%); and isolated stomatal complexes (2.35%) (Figure 7.1B). This description is in agreement with previous reports on the Cyperaceae family, in which it is classified as a silica accumulator (PIPERNO, 1988), and the cones are described as the phytolith diagnostic morphotype at family level (PIPERNO, 1988;FERNÁNDEZ HONAINE et al, 2009).…”
Section: Phytoliths From Plants A) Halophile-psamophile Communitysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Stenotaphrum secundatum (Poaceae, Panicoideae) (Figure 5.1F): the dominant phytolith morphotypes are panicoid bilobate (29.63%) and cross (18.5%) in concordance with other species of the Panicoideae subfamily (FERNÁNDEZ HONAINE et al, 2006). Moreover, silica skeletons were also found, being composed of panicoid bilobate (15.74%), panicoid bilobate and stomatal complexes (6.5%), crenate elongate (2.77%), panicoid bilobate and cross (2.3%), polylobate (1.39%), psilate elongate (0.93%), stomatal complexes (0.93%), long cells with silicified cell wall and panicoid bilobate (1.39%) and cross phytoliths (0.93%).…”
Section: Phytoliths From Plants A) Halophile-psamophile Communitymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The identifi cation of freshwater sponge spicules was based on the sponge spicules collection of Lepafe and works of Volkmer-Ribeiro & Parolin (2010). For the identification of phytoliths, the references of Piperno (2006), Honaine et al (2006), Lu et al (2007) and Osterrieth et al (2009) were especially helpful. Diatom frustules were recognized based in Leandrini et al (2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fossil phytoliths are now used for the reconstruction of paleoenvironments (e.g. Alam et al 2009, Barczi et al 2009, Boyd 2005, Bremond et al 2005, 2008a, 2008b, Delhon et al 2003, Evett et al 2007, Fernandez et al 2006, Gil et al 2007, Ghosh et al 2008, Gu et al 2008, Iriarte 2006, Iriarte and Paz 2009, Lu et al 2006, Lu and Liu 2005, Morris et al 2009, Neff et al 2006, Singh et al 2007, Thorn 2004, as indicators of ancient industrial and agricultural practices (e.g. Cabanes et al 2009, Horrocks and Rechtman 2009, Horrocks and Wozniak 2008, Petoe et al 2008, Tsartsidou et al 2008, to locate occupation surfaces and plant use at excavations (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A standard nomenclature for describing and naming phytoliths was not published until 2005 (Madella et al 2005). Today researchers continue to name and describe phytoliths produced by a wide variety of taxa (Ball et al 2007, Barboni et al 2007, Carnelli et al 2004, Fernandez et al 2006, Iriarte and Paz 2009, Tsartsidou et al 2007, Wallis 2003, but much work is needed in this area to access the full potential of phytolith analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%