Abstract:A field investigation was conducted at three dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT)-contaminated areas in Point Pelee National Park (PPNP), Leamington, ON. cultivar Howden and three native grass species, (Michx.) Nash (little bluestem), L. (switchgrass), and (Torr.) A. Gray (sand dropseed) were grown at three different sites in the PPNP having low (291 ng/g), moderate (5083 ng/g), and high (10,192 ng/g) soil DDT contamination levels. A threshold soil DDT concentration was identified at ∼5000 ng/g where the DDT … Show more
“…In particular, this is observed in Cucurbitaceae , such as pumpkin or squash. The DDX biomagnification tendency of the latter is distinct, therefore a number of publications have evaluated the potential for phytoremediation purposes. ,− …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is almost certain that the application of either surfactant solutions or surfactant–pesticide solutions will result in comparable effects, which is highly relevant for agronomists. A number of crops, in particular the Cucurbitacea , are known for their increased bioaccumulation of DDX and, therefore, are discussed as suitable for the phytoremediation of contaminated soils. ,− A higher mobility of DDX induced by surfactant activity could result in a shift in the uptake behavior of DDX in plants with a higher tendency of bioaccumulation, depending on the agrochemical treatment of the crop. While this is an intended effect in phytoremediation, an increase or even the mere detectability of DDX residues in food crops are perceived as a risk by the food value chain.…”
Even more than 50 years after the ban of DDT in Germany, farmers are still affected by its persistence in contaminated soils. Depending on the crop cultivated on such soils, this often leads to low-level residues of DDT and its metabolites DDE and DDD ("DDX"), which are perceived as a risk by the food value chain. Pesticide formulations used in modern agriculture commonly contain high levels of surfactants, but so far no open-field studies have evaluated the effects of these treatments on the mobility of lipophilic contaminants, such as DDX. In this field trial, a 1.03 ha section was cultivated with Cucurbita maxima under realistic conditions to monitor the mobility of DDX in low-level contaminated agricultural soils in dependence of common pesticide applications. A typical organic treatment was compared to a conventional protocol. Soil samples were taken before and after each application. Samples from the organic section featured significantly higher extractable DDX contents in soil and water compared to the conventional section. The results show that modern pesticide treatments can have an unforeseen, yet significant influence on the mobilization and, subsequently, on the plant bioavailability of incurred DDX residues depending on the formulation composition.
“…In particular, this is observed in Cucurbitaceae , such as pumpkin or squash. The DDX biomagnification tendency of the latter is distinct, therefore a number of publications have evaluated the potential for phytoremediation purposes. ,− …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is almost certain that the application of either surfactant solutions or surfactant–pesticide solutions will result in comparable effects, which is highly relevant for agronomists. A number of crops, in particular the Cucurbitacea , are known for their increased bioaccumulation of DDX and, therefore, are discussed as suitable for the phytoremediation of contaminated soils. ,− A higher mobility of DDX induced by surfactant activity could result in a shift in the uptake behavior of DDX in plants with a higher tendency of bioaccumulation, depending on the agrochemical treatment of the crop. While this is an intended effect in phytoremediation, an increase or even the mere detectability of DDX residues in food crops are perceived as a risk by the food value chain.…”
Even more than 50 years after the ban of DDT in Germany, farmers are still affected by its persistence in contaminated soils. Depending on the crop cultivated on such soils, this often leads to low-level residues of DDT and its metabolites DDE and DDD ("DDX"), which are perceived as a risk by the food value chain. Pesticide formulations used in modern agriculture commonly contain high levels of surfactants, but so far no open-field studies have evaluated the effects of these treatments on the mobility of lipophilic contaminants, such as DDX. In this field trial, a 1.03 ha section was cultivated with Cucurbita maxima under realistic conditions to monitor the mobility of DDX in low-level contaminated agricultural soils in dependence of common pesticide applications. A typical organic treatment was compared to a conventional protocol. Soil samples were taken before and after each application. Samples from the organic section featured significantly higher extractable DDX contents in soil and water compared to the conventional section. The results show that modern pesticide treatments can have an unforeseen, yet significant influence on the mobilization and, subsequently, on the plant bioavailability of incurred DDX residues depending on the formulation composition.
“…The specific cultivar selected for the field experiment, C. pepo cv. Howden, is a known accumulator of ΣDDX (Denyes et al 2016 ; Lunney et al 2010 , 2004 ; Paul et al 2015 ; White 2002 , 2001 ; Whitfield Åslund et al 2010 ).…”
Phytoextraction, utilizing plants to remove soil contaminants, is a promising approach for environmental remediation but its application is often limited due to the long time requirements. This study aims to develop simplified and user-friendly probabilistic models to estimate the time required for phytoextraction of contaminants while considering uncertainties. More specifically we: i) developed probabilistic models for time estimation, ii) applied these models using site-specific data from a field experiment testing pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo ssp. pepo cv. Howden) for phytoextraction of DDT and its metabolites (ΣDDX), iii) compared timeframes derived from site-specific data with literature-derived estimates, and iv) investigated model sensitivity and uncertainties through various modelling scenarios. The models indicate that phytoextraction with pumpkin to reduce the initial total concentration of ΣDDX in the soil (10 mg/kg dw) to acceptable levels (1 mg/kg dw) at the test site is infeasible within a reasonable timeframe, with time estimates ranging from 48–123 years based on literature data or 3 570–9 120 years with site-specific data using the linear or first-order exponential model, respectively. Our results suggest that phytoextraction may only be feasible at lower initial ΣDDX concentrations (< 5 mg/kg dw) for soil polishing and that alternative phytomanagement strategies should be considered for this test site to manage the bioavailable fraction of DDX in the soil. The simplified modes presented can be useful tools in the communication with site owners and stakeholders about time approximations for planning phytoextraction interventions, thereby improving the decision basis for phytomanagement of contaminated sites.
“…Los estudios de fitorremediación de suelos, aguas y sedimentos contaminados con DDT realizados en diferentes condiciones como laboratorio, invernadero y estudios in situ contribuyen de manera importante a la recuperación de los suelos agrícolas, y los cuerpos de aguas contaminadas con este insecticida o sus metabolitos (DDE y DDD). Una de las plantas de mayor estudio para su aplicación en la fitorremediación es Cucurbita pepo (Whitfield Åslund, Paul, Rutter & Zeeb, 2015;Eevers, Hawthorne, White, Vangronsveld & Weyens, 2016;Eevers, Hawthorne, White, Vangronsveld & Weyens, 2018), cuyas variedades tienen la capacidad de crecer en suelos contaminados con hasta 1,500 µg DDT/kg suelo, y de fitoextraer y acumular este contaminante entre 290 y 2,600 µg DDT/kg de tejido (Whitfield Åslund et al, 2010). Además, la capacidad de C. pepo para acumular DDT puede ser modificada al variar la disponibilidad de la materia orgánica en un suelo contaminado, lo anterior debido al incremento en la biodisponibilidad del contaminante .…”
Section: Fitorremediación De Sistemas Contaminados Con Ddt: Casos De Estudiounclassified
“…Los estudios in situ ayudan para identificar plantas con potencial fitorremediador porque proporcionan información en condiciones naturales; por ejemplo, Paul et al (2015) realizaron un estudio en tres áreas del Parque Nacional de Point Pelle, Leamington, Ontario, contaminadas con diferentes concentraciones de DDT baja, moderada y alta (0.192, 291 y 5,083 µg/kg, respectivamente). Las plantas utilizadas fueron Cucurbita pepo cv Howden y tres gramíneas nativas Schizachyrium scoparium (Michx.)…”
Section: Fitorremediación De Sistemas Contaminados Con Ddt: Casos De Estudiounclassified
El DDT (Dicloro Difenil Tricloroetano o 1,1,1-tricloro-2,2-bis-etano) representa un riesgo importante para la salud humana, debido a que se asocia con enfermedades como cáncer de mama, Alzheimer, Parkinson y su acumulación en sangre. Los recientes hallazgos del uso clandestino del DDT como agroquímico hacen necesaria la implementación de tecnologías de recuperación de suelos agrícolas contaminados con este compuesto. La fitorremediación es una tecnología sustentable, que utiliza el potencial de las plantas para remover contaminantes orgánicos e inorgánicos. Esta tecnología es mejorada con la inoculación de microorganismos rizosféricos que median el transporte de nutrientes y degradan compuestos orgánicos como el DDT. Esta revisión recopila información científica de los últimos diez años sobre: fitorremediación y fitorremediación asistida por microorganismos en sitios contaminados por DDT, y sus metabolitos diclorodifenildicloroetileno (DDE) y diclorodifenildicloroetano (DDD. Además, se resaltan los puntos más importantes que hacen de la fitorremediación una estrategia para la recuperación de suelos contaminados con DDT, DDE y DDD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.