2005
DOI: 10.1002/mrc.1631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phytochemistry in the microgram domain—a LC–NMR perspective

Abstract: Plants represent an extraordinary reservoir of novel molecules and there is currently a resurgence of interest in the vegetable kingdom as a possible source of new lead compounds for introduction into therapeutical screening programs. In order to discover potential new bioactive natural products, the dereplication of crude plant extracts performed prior to isolation work is of crucial importance for avoiding the isolation of a known constituent. In this respect, chemical screening strategies have been develope… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In plant metabolomics, these two technologies are commonly used as independent approaches for profiling plant systems (Le Gall et al 2003;Moco et al 2006a;Tikunov et al 2005;Ward et al 2003). The (online) combination of NMR and MS technologies (Jaroszewski 2005;Seger and Sturm 2007;Tatsis 2007;Wolfender et al 2005), in particular through LC-solid phase extraction (SPE)-NMR-MS (Exarchou et al 2003) has been used for the efficient detection, separation, isolation and unequivocal structural elucidation of metabolites from plant origin. This analytical approach seems therefore especially useful in the identification of biomarkers discovered in high-throughput LCMS and 1 H-NMR metabolomics studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In plant metabolomics, these two technologies are commonly used as independent approaches for profiling plant systems (Le Gall et al 2003;Moco et al 2006a;Tikunov et al 2005;Ward et al 2003). The (online) combination of NMR and MS technologies (Jaroszewski 2005;Seger and Sturm 2007;Tatsis 2007;Wolfender et al 2005), in particular through LC-solid phase extraction (SPE)-NMR-MS (Exarchou et al 2003) has been used for the efficient detection, separation, isolation and unequivocal structural elucidation of metabolites from plant origin. This analytical approach seems therefore especially useful in the identification of biomarkers discovered in high-throughput LCMS and 1 H-NMR metabolomics studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the potential role of sugarcane as a dietary source of flavonoids as well as its possible use as a functional food, this study involved an investigation into the antioxidant activity of Saccharum officinarum L. juice ("garapa") and the identification of active compounds from leaves and juice, using HPLC microfractionation 12 combined with TLC monitoring of the compounds with antioxidant activity ( -carotene test) and free radical scavenging activity (DPPH assays). 13 HPLC microfractionation consists of collecting the peak from an analytical-scale HPLC separation for more detailed examinations of the compounds on the microgram scale.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to MS, NMR is nondestructive in nature and capable of providing more structural information, but less sensitive for detecting lowabundance metabolites. Another advantage of NMR is that chromatographic separation is not required for NMR analysis even though LC-NMR technology has become a choice for conducting high-resolution analysis of complex chemical and metabolite mixture (38). In contrast, majority of MS-based metabolomics requires a separation process, such as GC, LC, and capillary electrophoresis (CE), prior to sample introduction and mass detection in MS system.…”
Section: Analytical Platform Of Metabolomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%