Soccer training is based on the optimal prescription of exercise mode, duration, and intensity. A daily task of coaches and fitness trainers is to plan an exercise program of adequate intensity. On the other hand, special care is given to see that the exercise intensity does not increase the likelihood of overtraining. When working with soccer players, coaches and fitness trainers often establish training heart rate (HR) intensities for aerobic exercise based on maximal HR (HR max ), for example, Karvonen method. [1] HR max is measured as the maximal value recorded at the end of graded exercise test (GXT) either in a laboratory or in the field. However, occasionally it is not desirable to perform a GXT (e.g. to avoid the fatigue induced by maximal testing during the competitive period).When it is not possible to measure HR max , its prediction from an age-based equation is an alternative, which is widely
Original ArticleBackground: Although maximal heart rate (HR max ) is widely used to assess exercise intensity in sport training, and particularly in soccer, there are limited data with regards to the use of age-based prediction equations of HR max in soccer players. The aim of this study was to compare the measured-HR max with two prediction equations (Fox-HR max = 220 − age and Tanaka-HR max = 208 − 0.7 × age) in soccer players.
Methods:Adolescent (n = 162, 15.8 ± 1.5 years) and adult players (n = 158, 23.4 ± 4.6 years), all members of competitive clubs, voluntarily performed a graded exercise field test (Conconi protocol) to assess HR max .
Results:The measured-HR max (197.6 ± 9.4 bpm in total, 200.2 ± 7.9 bpm in adolescent players, and 195.0 ± 10.0 bpm in adult players) was explained by the formula HR max = 212.3 − 0.75 × age (r = −0.41, standard error of the estimate = 8.6). In the total sample, Fox-HR max overestimated measured-HR max [mean difference (95% confidence intervals) = 2.8 bpm (1.6; 3.9)], while Tanaka
Conclusions:The results of this study failed to validate two widely used prediction equations in a large sample of soccer players, indicating the need for a sport-specific equation. On the other hand, the new equation that we presented should be investigated further by future studies before being adopted by coaches and fitness trainers. (Biomed J 2015;38:84-89)