“…(total sample, stroke/cardiopulmonary patients), ↑ (others)- Absolute improvement in Barthel Index: n.s. (total sample, stroke patients, others), ↑ (cardiopulmonary patients)Feasibility:- Missing data: Barthel Index = 0% (admission), 6% (discharge)Blanc-Bisson 2008 [33]France | n = 76Mean age: 85 yrs.Females: n = 55 (72%);Patients with acute medical illness | Intervention:- Additional early physiotherapy (start: day 1 or 2, 2 times/day for 30 min, 5 days/week),- Focus on leg extension exercises in the upright position- Nutritional supplementsControl:- Walking with/without technical assistance or human help (start: day 3 to 6, 3 times/week until discharge)- Nutritional supplements- Physical therapy at home for 1 month | MOB: Handgrip strength (handheld dynamometry) FCT: Katz ADL Index BPN: Body weight, energy intake, protein intake, calf and arm circumferences, triceps skin fold, biochemical measures (serum albumin, C-reactive protein) | AdmissionClinical stable condition | Changes from admission to clinical stable situation in total sample (time effect):- Katz ADL Index: ↓Feasibility:- Missing data: Katz ADL Index = 0% |
Brown 2016 [34]USA | n = 100Mean age: 74 yrs.Females: n = 3 (3%)Patients with acute medical illness | Intervention:- Additional mobility protocol: Starting with basic transfers with progress to ambulation if tolerated (2 times/day, 15–20 min, 7 days/week)- Patients were encouraged to walk at each session- Physical activity behavioral strategy: goal setting, diary and interview to increase times out of bedControl: Usual care (physical therapy had to be ordered by physicians) | FCT: Modified Katz ADL Index HU: LOS, physical therapy ordered during hospitalizationACE: Falls | AdmissionDischarge | Between-group differences at discharge:- Modified Katz ADL Index: n.s.Changes during hospitalization in total sample:- Katz ADL Index: n.s.Group × time interaction during hospitalization:- Katz ADL Index: n.s.Feasibility:- Katz ADL Index: mean admission score in both groups was within the best 15% of the rating scale → ceiling effect |
Czyzewski 2013 [35]Poland | n = 34Mean age: 76 yrs.Females: n = 14 (41%);Patients with major abdominal surgery | Intervention:- Usual care with a modified exercise component based on the Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation concept (30 min/day)Control: Usual care (30 min/day) | MOB: 10MWT, TUG FCT: Lawton IADL scale MOB: UCLA scale, PPSA BPN: Forced ventilation capacity, first-second forced expiratory volume, maximal expiratory flow (spirometry)HU: LOS | 3 days prior surgery4 days after surgery | Within-group changes from 3 days prior surgery to 4 days after surgery:- 10MWT, TUG: ↓ in both groups- Lawton IADL scale, UCLA, PPSA: NABetween-group differences 4 days after surgery:- PPSA: ↑- 10MWT, TUG: NAFeasibility:- Lawton IADL scale: mean admission score of the sample was within the best 15% of the rating scale → ceiling effect- Missing data (3 days prior & 4 days after surgery): 10MWT, TUG = 9%, SAP = 0%, UCLA, IADL: NA |
Eyres 2005 [36]Australia | n = 15Mean age: 80 yrs.Females: n = 9 (60%);Patients with acute medical illness | Intervention:- Daily additional occupational therapy- Self-care program (ADL), IADL training (e.g., cooking, laundry, café visits), community mobility (e.g., walking outdoors)Control: Usual care | FCT: FIM PSY: Self-Efficacy Gauge, Life Satisfaction Index HU: LOS, use of allied health serv... |
…”