1967
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1967.30.2.236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiology and ultrastructure of electrotonic junctions. IV. Medullary electromotor nuclei in gymnotid fish.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
92
0
1

Year Published

1971
1971
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
92
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The smaller pacemaker cell type had an average input resistance of 3.7 Ϯ 0.30 M⍀ (n ϭ 10), whereas the larger relay cell type showed an average input resistance of 2.7 Ϯ 0.11 M⍀ (n ϭ 8). This overall range of input resistance in pacemaker and relay cells is consistent with earlier reports in other gymnotiform fish (Bennett et al, 1967;Spiro, 1997).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The smaller pacemaker cell type had an average input resistance of 3.7 Ϯ 0.30 M⍀ (n ϭ 10), whereas the larger relay cell type showed an average input resistance of 2.7 Ϯ 0.11 M⍀ (n ϭ 8). This overall range of input resistance in pacemaker and relay cells is consistent with earlier reports in other gymnotiform fish (Bennett et al, 1967;Spiro, 1997).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Penetrations of pacemaker and relay cells were achieved by applying brief overcompensation of capacitance neutralization and/or slight mechanical tapping of the head stage of the microdrive. Once the membrane potential of each penetrated cell had stabilized and a steady baseline membrane potential was recorded, cells were characterized physiologically as either pacemaker or relay cells based on action potential wave forms; action potentials in pacemaker cells exhibited gradually depolarizing potentials between spikes that are lacking in relay cells (Bennett et al, 1967;Juranek and Metzner, 1997). After data collection from each cell, a positively biased sinusoidal current (ϳ2.0 nA for 5-10 min) was used to inject neurobiotin into the cell.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cells comprising this neuronal cluster project to relay cells in the Pn where they make glutamatergic synaptic contact involving non-NMDA glutamate receptors (Dye et al 1989). This synaptic input from the CP/PPn-C results in rapid depolarization of the relay cells, which in turn leads to an acceleration of the firing frequency of both the pacemaker cells and the relay cells (Dye 1988), likely due to the extensive gap-junction coupling between these neurons (Bennett et al 1967;Elekes and Szabo 1985;Moortgat et al 2000;Tokunaga et al 1980). Although never examined, it is plausible that the glutamatergic input from the CP/PPn-C to the relay cells of the Pn is much weaker in females than in males.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Fig.1, the solitary G. omarorum emits sexually monomorphic triphasic electric pulses at around 25Hz at 20°C (Caputi, 1999;Richer-de-Forges et al, 2009), whereas the gregarious B. gauderio emits sexually dimorphic biphasic electric pulses at around 15Hz at 20°C (Hopkins et al, 1990;Caputi et al, 1998). In both species, a medullary pacemaker nucleus (PN) controls the timing of the electric organ discharge (EOD) (Bennett et al, 1967). The spatial organization and innervation pattern of the peripheral electric organ are responsible for the species-specific EOD waveform (TrujilloCenóz et al, 1984;Stoddard, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%