1961
DOI: 10.1288/00005537-196107000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiology and pathology of the cricothyroid muscle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
1
7

Year Published

1962
1962
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
74
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Using radiography, it was shown that the visor is in a partly open neutral position during quiet respiration (Sonninen, 1956;Fink & Demarest , 1978) and the CT space became narrower with rising pitch (Moeller & Fisher, 1904) and wider with decreasing pitch (Vilkman et al, 1997). These findings were subsequently confirmed by others (Arnold, 1961;Ardran & Kemp, 1966;Harris, et al, 1998). However, Laukkanen et al (2002) demonstrated that the decrease in CT space was not linearly related to rising pitch.…”
Section: Vocal Pitch and The Cricothyroid Spacesupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using radiography, it was shown that the visor is in a partly open neutral position during quiet respiration (Sonninen, 1956;Fink & Demarest , 1978) and the CT space became narrower with rising pitch (Moeller & Fisher, 1904) and wider with decreasing pitch (Vilkman et al, 1997). These findings were subsequently confirmed by others (Arnold, 1961;Ardran & Kemp, 1966;Harris, et al, 1998). However, Laukkanen et al (2002) demonstrated that the decrease in CT space was not linearly related to rising pitch.…”
Section: Vocal Pitch and The Cricothyroid Spacesupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Cinematographic and radiographic observations (Ranke & Lullies, 1953;Hollien, 1960;Fink, 1962), as well as electromyography (EMG) studies (Arnold, 1961;Yanagihara & von Leden, 1968;Hirano et al, 1969;Gay et al, 1972;Atkinson, 1978;Shipp et al, 1979;Roubeau et al, 1997;Kochis-Jennings et al, 2012), have all demonstrated that the CT muscle is the prime contributor to controlling F0 during phonation (Freedman, 1956;Hast, 1966;Yanagihara & von Leden, 1968;Haglund, 1973;Stone & Nuttall, 1974;Braund et al, 1988;Pešák, 2009). Further compounding the complexity of F0 control is the intrinsic complexity of the CT muscle itself.…”
Section: Muscular Control Of Fundamental Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cricothyroid joints allow two types of motion: rotation around the frontal axis and horizontal sliding of the cricoid cartilage in the sagittal axis leading to posterior displacement of the arytenoids with lengthening and thinning of the vocal folds (51).…”
Section: Ebsln Function and Dysfunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the rectus CT attaches the cricoid arch and the inferior margin of the thyroid cartilages, its contraction approaches both cartilages. This mechanical action leads to an increase in the relative distance between the thyroid and arytenoid cartilages, thereby lengthening, tensing, and adducting the vocal folds, which are critical for vocal pitch elevation (Arnold, 1961). In contrast, the CT-o arises from the anterosuperior cricoid arch and inserts at the juncture between the thyroid lamina and inferior horn and onto the anterior surface of the inferior horn.…”
Section: Possible Functional Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%