1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60018-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiology and Genetics of Sulfur-oxidizing Bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
152
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 205 publications
0
152
0
Order By: Relevance
“…soxVW and soxXYZABCDEFGH (Friedrich et al, 2000;Mukhopadhyaya et al, 2000;Rother et al, 2001;AppiaAyme & Berks, 2002). A consensus mechanism allegedly governing the complete oxidation of thiosulfate, sulfite, sulfide and elemental sulfur has been proposed with a-proteobacteria as model systems involving a sulfuroxidizing multi-enzyme complex comprising the thiosulfate-induced periplasmic proteins SoxXA, SoxYZ, SoxB and SoxCD (Friedrich, 1998;Appia-Ayme et al, 2001). While the proteins SoxV and SoxW are believed to be involved in the biosynthesis or maintenance of the multienzyme complex system Appia-Ayme & Berks, 2002), the genes soxEFGH, though co-expressed with the sox structural genes in P. pantotrophus, might not be essential for sulfur oxidation by the aforesaid mechanism (Rother et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…soxVW and soxXYZABCDEFGH (Friedrich et al, 2000;Mukhopadhyaya et al, 2000;Rother et al, 2001;AppiaAyme & Berks, 2002). A consensus mechanism allegedly governing the complete oxidation of thiosulfate, sulfite, sulfide and elemental sulfur has been proposed with a-proteobacteria as model systems involving a sulfuroxidizing multi-enzyme complex comprising the thiosulfate-induced periplasmic proteins SoxXA, SoxYZ, SoxB and SoxCD (Friedrich, 1998;Appia-Ayme et al, 2001). While the proteins SoxV and SoxW are believed to be involved in the biosynthesis or maintenance of the multienzyme complex system Appia-Ayme & Berks, 2002), the genes soxEFGH, though co-expressed with the sox structural genes in P. pantotrophus, might not be essential for sulfur oxidation by the aforesaid mechanism (Rother et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulphite oxidation can support chemolithotrophic and phototrophic growth in a diverse range of bacteria and archaea (Wood, 1988;Sorokin, 1995;Friedrich, 1998) and is known to occur either by direct oxidation, usually utilizing a molybdenum-containing sulphite : cytochrome c oxidoreductase (SOR) or by indirect, AMP-dependent oxidation via the intermediate adenylylsulphate (Wood, 1988;. In this study, we demonstrate the ability of the chemoheterotrophic pathogen C. jejuni to utilize sulphite and metabisulphite as respiratory electron donors, identify the proteins constituting the sulphite oxidase and elucidate the pathway for electron transport from sulphite to oxygen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pantotrophus grows with thiosulfate exclusively under aerobic conditions and not anaerobically with nitrate as electron acceptor (Friedrich, 1998). The formation of proteins required for chemotrophic growth with thiosulfate is induced by thiosulfate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The Sox proteins required for sulfur oxidation are expressed in the presence of thiosulfate in chemotrophic bacteria Kelly et al, 1997) as are the respective proteins in phototrophic purple bacteria, purple non-sulfur and green bacteria (reviewed by Friedrich, 1998). Apart from marginal physiological studies no information is available on the regulation of the proteins involved in sulfur oxidation at the molecular biological level, or on the mechanisms that lead to the formation of the Sox proteins in chemotrophic or phototrophic bacteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%