2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.01.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological Tolerance to ssDNA Enables Strand Uncoupling during DNA Replication

Abstract: Graphical Abstract Highlights d POLA1 inhibitors (PolAis) cause the uncoupling of leading and lagging strand synthesis d PolAi results in ssDNA formation at the lagging strand and a replication catastrophe d ssDNA caused by PolAis does not activate an ATRdependent stress response d RPA surplus allows cells to duplicate their genome with elevated strand uncoupling and ssDNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
45
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(60 reference statements)
7
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Helicase-polymerase uncoupling has been described in various checkpoint mutants when exposed to DNA damage or hydroxyurea, the effector kinase of the intra-S-phase checkpoint, Rad53, has been proposed as a key regulator of CMG progression in the absence of replication (Gan et al 2017;Devbhandari and Remus 2020). In our experiments, Rad53 is phosphorylated in the absence of Pol α function in cdc17-1,2-FRB cells, which confirms studies in other eukaryotes showing that the intra-S-phase checkpoint is activated in the presence of aphidicolin or polymerase α inhibition (Byun et al 2005;Ercilla et al 2020). We found that the intra-S-phase checkpoint does not ultimately regulate movement of the CMG complex when polymerase α function is perturbed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Helicase-polymerase uncoupling has been described in various checkpoint mutants when exposed to DNA damage or hydroxyurea, the effector kinase of the intra-S-phase checkpoint, Rad53, has been proposed as a key regulator of CMG progression in the absence of replication (Gan et al 2017;Devbhandari and Remus 2020). In our experiments, Rad53 is phosphorylated in the absence of Pol α function in cdc17-1,2-FRB cells, which confirms studies in other eukaryotes showing that the intra-S-phase checkpoint is activated in the presence of aphidicolin or polymerase α inhibition (Byun et al 2005;Ercilla et al 2020). We found that the intra-S-phase checkpoint does not ultimately regulate movement of the CMG complex when polymerase α function is perturbed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our results suggest that in addition to impacting replisome progression, the mechanisms that regulate helicase-polymerase uncoupling contribute to replication initiation. Failure to regulate helicase uncoupling at the origin via a "dead man's switch" may trigger replication catastrophe resulting from the generation of excess ssDNA and the sequestration of RPA (Toledo et al 2013;Ercilla et al 2020), thus mechanisms regulating helicase uncoupling from the replisome are likely conserved across eukaryotes and critical for preserving genome stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5A&B). Similarly, a recent report in human cells detected higher levels of RPA-bound ssDNA upon Pol knockdown (47). While Pol hypomorphs in humans show evidence of underreplicated DNA and DSBs, it is unknown if repair of damage due to hypomorphic Pol is repaired by HR or another mechanism in humans (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although TLS-induced mutations and lesion bypass cannot be overlooked as providing a selective advantage for tumorigenesis and/or chemoresistance, TLS-induced RGS should also be considered. First, RGS mitigates replication gaps that cause replication catastrophe, a situation in which ssDNA becomes exposed to nucleases when ssDNA exceeds protection by the ssDNA binding protein, RPA [101]. Conceivably, oncogene-induced senescence is also linked to replication catastrophe so that oncogenic transformation requires either RGS by TLS or higher RPA levels.…”
Section: Tls-induced Mutagenesis Vs Rgs In Cancer Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%