2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological significance of forest tree defoliation: Results from a survey in a mixed forest in Tuscany (central Italy)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first months after the drought event, evergreen trees retain the dead leaves, so, at least in the short period, the amount of dry leaves on the plant is a better indicator of drought impact than defoliation. Defoliation levels were close to those observed in previous surveys carried out on Mediterranean forests in Tuscany, on forests not affected by drought (Pollastrini et al, 2016). The results presented in Table 1 suggest therefore that Q. ilex, with a significantly higher amount of dead leaves, is more drought sensitive than P. latifolia, in line with a large body of evidence on the comparative behavior of these two species under stress conditions (Peñuelas et al, 1998(Peñuelas et al, , 2000Barbeta et al, 2013;Rosas et al, 2013;Sperlich et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In the first months after the drought event, evergreen trees retain the dead leaves, so, at least in the short period, the amount of dry leaves on the plant is a better indicator of drought impact than defoliation. Defoliation levels were close to those observed in previous surveys carried out on Mediterranean forests in Tuscany, on forests not affected by drought (Pollastrini et al, 2016). The results presented in Table 1 suggest therefore that Q. ilex, with a significantly higher amount of dead leaves, is more drought sensitive than P. latifolia, in line with a large body of evidence on the comparative behavior of these two species under stress conditions (Peñuelas et al, 1998(Peñuelas et al, , 2000Barbeta et al, 2013;Rosas et al, 2013;Sperlich et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In addition, previous studies have also described strong species identity effects on crown defoliation (e.g., Bussotti et al, 2018;Pollastrini et al, 2016). Thus, identity and diversity may affect tree defoliation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The sampling and assessment of adult trees in forest conditions poses specific problems, such as the standardization of sampling procedures, the variability of the parameters considered within the plant and the stand, and the role of ecological and structural features in modifying the Impacts. These methodological issues have been addressed in [5,27,29,87] for the assessment of chlorophyll a fluorescence properties. Thanks to the results of these studies, we can now select the most robust and reliable parameters to assess the physiological vitality of trees and to interpret them in relation to the functional traits and ecological behavior of a tree species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry (F V /F M ), which is the most commonly used fluorescence parameter, is easily measurable in field conditions with different kinds of instruments [20] and has been probed and determined to be useful for characterizing responses and the adaptation of plants to stress [25]. ChlF analysis, with special reference to prompt fluorescence [26], has been extensively applied in forests [5,[27][28][29], and the relationships between ChlF parameters, crown defoliation, and foliar traits have been explored extensively [30,31]. ChlF fluorescence can also be assessed by means of remote sensing techniques [32].…”
Section: Crown Conditions and Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation