1982
DOI: 10.1161/01.res.50.5.695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological significance of coronary flow velocity and changing stenosis geometry during coronary vasodilation in awake dogs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approaches that integrate all angiographic dimensions are conceptually attractive,2' but limited by the fact that coronary flow is estimated. We used theoretical flows of 1, 2, 31 Therefore, we continued medical treatment, including nitrates and calcium antagonists, in all our patients with CAD on the day of the investigation. Most important to our study, this could affect measurement of the papaverine-induced change in geometry of stenosis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches that integrate all angiographic dimensions are conceptually attractive,2' but limited by the fact that coronary flow is estimated. We used theoretical flows of 1, 2, 31 Therefore, we continued medical treatment, including nitrates and calcium antagonists, in all our patients with CAD on the day of the investigation. Most important to our study, this could affect measurement of the papaverine-induced change in geometry of stenosis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 However, patients in the present study received intracoronary nitroglycerin every 30 minutes throughout the procedure to vasodilate the epicardial vessels before hyperemia was induced. In contrast, coronary artery stenoses are frequently at least partially compliant, and stenosis dimensions then depend on intrastenotic pressure.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Pressure-gradient-flowvelocity Relatiomentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A great intra-and interobserver variation exists [27][28][29] , as well as a limited capacity of the observers to predict the hemodynamic significance of a certain coronary stenosis 30,31 . Quantitative coronary angiography improved the evaluation of the degree of coronary stenosis 32 , but limitations still persist 33,34 . In addition, the demonstration of the stenosis and its degree does not describe the level of the perfusion defect, or the myocardial area involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%