The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1080/09670262.2016.1193902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological responses of carbon-sequestering microalgae to elevated carbon regimes

Abstract: In order to identify a high carbon-sequestering microalgal strain, the physiological effect of different concentrations of carbon sources on microalgae growth was investigated. Five indigenous strains (I-1, I-2, I-3, I-4 and I-5) and a reference strain (I-0: Coccolithus pelagicus 913/3) were subjected to CO 2 concentrations of 0.03-15% and NaHCO 3 of 0.05-2 g CO 2 l-1. The logistic model was applied for data fitting, as well as for estimation of the maximum growth rate (μ max) and the biomass carrying capacity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference was considered and used to correct the values recorded from gradient-treated co-cultivated cells. In microalgae, F v /F M values of about 0.6 indicate an efficient use of light in the photosynthetic processes (White et al 2013;Sirin and Sillanpää 2015;Bhola et al 2016). F V /F M was higher in mono-cultivated than in the cocultivated cells (Fig.…”
Section: Psii Maximum Quantum Yield Measurementioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This difference was considered and used to correct the values recorded from gradient-treated co-cultivated cells. In microalgae, F v /F M values of about 0.6 indicate an efficient use of light in the photosynthetic processes (White et al 2013;Sirin and Sillanpää 2015;Bhola et al 2016). F V /F M was higher in mono-cultivated than in the cocultivated cells (Fig.…”
Section: Psii Maximum Quantum Yield Measurementioning
confidence: 92%
“…The low F V /F M values is in line with the lower growth observed in co-culture and indicates a stress condition of the microorganisms; in fact, the analysis of the PSII maximum quantum yield by PAM fluorimetry allows an estimate of the photosynthetic efficiency and can be used as a parameter to evidence the physiological stress in microalgae (Cosgrove and Borowitzka 2010;Ramanna et al 2014;Dao and Beardall 2016). In microalgae, F V /F M values higher than 0.6 indicate good conditions of growth and an efficient use of light for photosynthesis, a condition met in mono-cultures (White et al 2013;Sirin and Sillanpää 2015;Bhola et al 2016). Lower F V /F M values were generally reported under nutrient deficiency or very dense cultures or light-stressed cultures (Beardall et al 2001a, b;Baldisserotto et al 2014;Benvenuti et al 2015).…”
Section: Photosynthetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Logistic models have been widely applied in the literature to capture the growth behaviour of microalgae strains. 17,18 Model parameters were evaluated by tuning their values to obtain the best agreement between model simulations and experimental data. It should be noted that the fitted value of 𝑋 !…”
Section: Quantitative Evaluation Of Algae Growth Using a Logistic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In microalgae, assessment of their photosynthetic efficiency and variability in chlorophyll fluorescence can be done using Pulse Amplitude Modulation (PAM) fluorometry (Oxborough et al, 2000, Schreiber et al, 2002, Baker, 2008, Stirbet & Govindjee, 2011. Measuring photosystem II (PSII) quantum efficiency via PAM fluorometry is one of the most well used, rapid and non-invasive techniques to evaluate the physiological state of phytoplankton (Juneau et al, 2005, Lombardi & Maldonado, 2011, Bhola et al, 2016.…”
Section: Assessment Of Culture Recovery and Photosynthetic Health Of ...mentioning
confidence: 99%