2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological responses in a Concealed Information Test are determined interactively by encoding procedure and questioning format

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, a dissociation was observed between autonomic responses and an explicit memory test: In detail, the results showed larger SCRs to deeply encoded details while no differences were obtained in an explicit memory test. Comparable results were also reported by Ambach et al (2011) who found enhanced autonomic responses to stolen items as compared to details that were only seen during the mock crime. This result emerged even when excluding items that were not explicitly remembered but it only occurred when emphasizing the act of stealing in the CIT questions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In this study, a dissociation was observed between autonomic responses and an explicit memory test: In detail, the results showed larger SCRs to deeply encoded details while no differences were obtained in an explicit memory test. Comparable results were also reported by Ambach et al (2011) who found enhanced autonomic responses to stolen items as compared to details that were only seen during the mock crime. This result emerged even when excluding items that were not explicitly remembered but it only occurred when emphasizing the act of stealing in the CIT questions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, when deception and knowledge were controlled, and the effect of guilt was examined alone, a very high rate of false positives was reported for informed innocent participants (Bradley et al, 1996). Similarly, in a recent study Ambach et al, (2011) manipulated the mode of item handling (stealing vs. merely viewing the critical items) and questioning format (GAT like stealing questioning vs. CIT like viewing questioning) and found that with the viewing questioning the mode of item handling did not influence physiological responses, whereas with the stealing questioning it did. Gamer (2010) found that both the GAT and CIT did not allow for a valid differentiation of guilty and informed innocent participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In order to ensure equal footing of the two groups of participants, their knowledge of the critical information was controlled by ensuring that both, the guilty and the informed innocent participants alike, possessed the same critical knowledge. Furthermore, since it may be argued that handling the items during the performance of a mock-crime is likely to produce deeper encoding of the critical information than written information conveyed to the innocent participants (Ambach et al, 2011;Gamer, 2010), it was assured that the innocent participants would actually handle these items in an innocent context. All participants were encouraged to be found innocent by monetary rewards for success on the test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same holds for a stronger intention to deceive (Furedy and Ben-Shakhar, 1991), a greater response conflict between the predominant truthful and the required deceptive answer (Furedy and Ben-Shakhar, 1991; Bradley et al, 1996), and a greater attentiveness throughout the test (countered by countermeasures; see, e.g., Elaad and Ben-Shakhar, 1991). In addition, an “active” questioning format (e.g., “Did you steal this object?”) has been suggested to be more effective than a more “passive” questioning format (e.g., “Was this object in the deed room?”, “Did you see this object?”; Bradley et al, 1996; Ambach et al, 2011a; but see Gamer, 2010). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%