2016
DOI: 10.1515/hukin-2016-0038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological Responses During the Time Limit at 100% of the Peak Velocity in the Carminatti’s Test in Futsal Players

Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate the physiological responses during the time limit at the intensity of the peak velocity of the Carminatti’s test (T-CAR). Ten professional futsal players (age, 27.4 ± 5.8 years, body mass, 78.8 ± 8.5 kg, body height, 175.8 ± 6.8 cm, body fat mass, 14.1 ± 2.6%) took part in the study. The players performed three tests, with an interval of at least 48 hours, as follows: the T-CAR to determine the peak velocity and the maximal heart rate; an incremental treadmill protocol … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CPET with treadmill ramp protocol showed that VO 2max = 0.7±4.7 mL/kg/min for the hearing players. These values agree with those reported in Malaysian futsal players (Galy et al, 2015), VO 2max =51.4±3.2 mL/kg/min, and in Brazilian professional futsal players (Floriano et al, 2016), VO 2max =49.6±4.7 mL/kg/min. Our results, in addition to those found in the literature, provide a good benchmark for VO 2 in futsal players, although some studies (Alvarez et al, 2009; Beato et al, 2016) have reported VO 2max closed to 60 mL/kg/min.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The CPET with treadmill ramp protocol showed that VO 2max = 0.7±4.7 mL/kg/min for the hearing players. These values agree with those reported in Malaysian futsal players (Galy et al, 2015), VO 2max =51.4±3.2 mL/kg/min, and in Brazilian professional futsal players (Floriano et al, 2016), VO 2max =49.6±4.7 mL/kg/min. Our results, in addition to those found in the literature, provide a good benchmark for VO 2 in futsal players, although some studies (Alvarez et al, 2009; Beato et al, 2016) have reported VO 2max closed to 60 mL/kg/min.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, as reported above, players achieve mean and peak VO 2 values during competition which correspond to their 76 and 99% of VO 2max , respectively. Upon review, 31 studies (Barbero-Alvarez et al, 2009 ; Gorostiaga et al, 2009 ; Baroni and Leal Junior, 2010 ; Castagna and Barbero-Alvarez, 2010 ; Milanez et al, 2011 ; Makaje et al, 2012 ; Boullosa et al, 2013 ; Oliveira et al, 2013 ; Pedro et al, 2013 ; Cuadrado-Peñafiel et al, 2014 ; Miloski et al, 2014 ; Soares-Caldeira et al, 2014 ; De Freitas et al, 2015 , 2019 ; Galy et al, 2015 ; Garcia-Tabar et al, 2015 ; Charlot et al, 2016 ; Floriano et al, 2016 ; Nakamura et al, 2016 , 2018 ; Naser and Ali, 2016 ; Barbieri et al, 2017 ; Barcelos et al, 2017 ; Valladares-Rodriguez et al, 2017 ; Nogueira et al, 2018 ; Zarebska et al, 2018 , 2019 ; Farhani et al, 2019 ; Nikolaidis et al, 2019 ; Teixeira et al, 2019 ; Wlodarczyk et al, 2019 , 2020 ; Bekris et al, 2020 ) have looked at the physiological characteristics of elite futsal players ( Table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed look at the published studies portrays that different kinds of tests have been used to assess aerobic performance in futsal (e.g., Yo-Yo IR1–IR2, FIET, 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test, Futsal Circuit, and Carminatti's test) and that fitness field tests may be useful to evaluate the aerobic capacity on elite players (Castagna and Barbero-Alvarez, 2010 ; Boullosa et al, 2013 ; Garcia-Tabar et al, 2015 ; Floriano et al, 2016 ; Barbieri et al, 2017 ; Valladares-Rodriguez et al, 2017 ). For example, a study by Nakamura et al ( 2016 ) showed that Brazilian elite players covered 1,500 ± 287 m in the Yo-Yo IR1 test whereas a sample of under-20 players completed only 1,264.0 ± 397.9 m. Thus, it appears that such type of protocols may differentiate athletes from different age categories.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VO 2 and HR data were reduced to 15 s mean values. The highest values obtained in this 15 s interval for VO 2 and HR during the T-CAR protocol performed on the grass training surface were considered as VO 2 peak and HRpeak, respectively (Da Silva et al, 2015;Floriano et al, 2016). During the HIIE model on each training surface, the VO 2 and HR data were reduced to 5 s mean values, and the VO 2 and HR values obtained in each running set was considered as the average of the last two min of exercise (Floriano et al, 2016).…”
Section: Cardiorespiratory Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest values obtained in this 15 s interval for VO 2 and HR during the T-CAR protocol performed on the grass training surface were considered as VO 2 peak and HRpeak, respectively (Da Silva et al, 2015;Floriano et al, 2016). During the HIIE model on each training surface, the VO 2 and HR data were reduced to 5 s mean values, and the VO 2 and HR values obtained in each running set was considered as the average of the last two min of exercise (Floriano et al, 2016). The VO 2 and HR responses for each running set (set 1, set 2, and set 3) were expressed as relative percentages of the VO 2 peak and HRpeak (%VO 2 peak and %HRpeak, respectively) reached in T-CAR.…”
Section: Cardiorespiratory Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%