1992
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0981(92)90039-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological response of the stipitate understory kelp, Pterygophora californica Ruprecht, to shading by the giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera C. Agardh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kimura & Foster (1984) found Macrocystis pyrifera and understory recruitment to be significantly greater following disturbance caused by summer kelp harvesting in central California. Pterygophora californica in that region showed physiological responses to harvest~ng of M, pyrifera canopies within a month (Watanabe et al 1992), suggesting that population responses may be related to within-year variability in canopy cover of the competitive dominant. Recently, understory kelp abundance has been related to a gradient in physical disturbance; the more extreme the annual disturbance-induced fluctuations in giant kelp populations, the more abundant the understory (Harrold et al 1988, Watanabe et al 1992.…”
Section: U)mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kimura & Foster (1984) found Macrocystis pyrifera and understory recruitment to be significantly greater following disturbance caused by summer kelp harvesting in central California. Pterygophora californica in that region showed physiological responses to harvest~ng of M, pyrifera canopies within a month (Watanabe et al 1992), suggesting that population responses may be related to within-year variability in canopy cover of the competitive dominant. Recently, understory kelp abundance has been related to a gradient in physical disturbance; the more extreme the annual disturbance-induced fluctuations in giant kelp populations, the more abundant the understory (Harrold et al 1988, Watanabe et al 1992.…”
Section: U)mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Dayton et al 1984, Reed & Foster 1984, Foster & Schiel 1985, Carr 1989), but less is known of temporal and spatial variability in these interactions. As Watanabe et al (1992) asked: How frequent and intense must competition for light be to control spatial distribution and population structure? Kimura & Foster (1984) found Macrocystis pyrifera and understory recruitment to be significantly greater following disturbance caused by summer kelp harvesting in central California.…”
Section: U)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Edwards (1998) observed that the increases in Desmarestia abundance following kelp-canopy removal was due to the enhanced recruitment of its sporophytes (by means of reproduction of its microscopic gametophytes; Edwards 2000), while Watanabe et al (1992) observed that Pterygophora exhibited a positive physiological response (increased growth, fecundity and photosynthesis) following removal of the Macrocystis canopy. Similarly, Roberts (1996) observed that at least some red algae (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These stored carbohydrates are used to fuel 90% of annual plant growth during the winter period of darkness when nutrients are abundant. Laminariales can accumulate up to 15 to 20% DW in carbohydrates (German 1986, Watanabe et al 1992). The deep-water population of Pleurophycus gardneri examined here, however, only accumulated 5 to 9% DW as carbohydrates, with the stipe the main reservoir and the blade the main source.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although light is also a common limiting factor for many marine ecosystems, including those dominated by the temperate to high latitude kelps (Dean 1985, Schiel & Foster 1986), very few algae exhibit a deciduous life history. Canopy cover of Macrocystis pyrifera can limit light availability to understory algae in temperate latitudes (Reed & Foster 1984, Watanabe et al 1992, and episodic disturbance by large storms can influence the growth and persistence of algae that would otherwise be excluded by light limitation (Edwards 1998). However, there is no clear evidence that the newly settled algae undergo a seasonally adjusted metabolic response to light availability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%