2007
DOI: 10.1109/robot.2007.363596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological Motion Compensation in Robotized Surgery using Force Feedback Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Cagneau et al developed a force control approach using iterative learning control (ILC) that has the advantage of not requiring a model of the contact interaction [82]. The inherent issue of this approach is lack of [64]; (C) A scanning device using hydraulic micro-balloons: reprinted with IEEE permission from [76]; (D) A distal scanner using the conic-spiraleur mechanism: reprinted with IEEE permission from [77]; (E) A rigid concentric tube scanning mechanism to facilitate large area mosaicking: reprinted with IEEE permission from [79]; (F) A miniature linkage scanning device for microscopic imaging of the walls of the cavity created during breast conserving surgery: adapted from [80], © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015.…”
Section: Force Control Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Cagneau et al developed a force control approach using iterative learning control (ILC) that has the advantage of not requiring a model of the contact interaction [82]. The inherent issue of this approach is lack of [64]; (C) A scanning device using hydraulic micro-balloons: reprinted with IEEE permission from [76]; (D) A distal scanner using the conic-spiraleur mechanism: reprinted with IEEE permission from [77]; (E) A rigid concentric tube scanning mechanism to facilitate large area mosaicking: reprinted with IEEE permission from [79]; (F) A miniature linkage scanning device for microscopic imaging of the walls of the cavity created during breast conserving surgery: adapted from [80], © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015.…”
Section: Force Control Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these architectures have to deal with higher sensor noise (e.g., for low contact forces, the noise is often bigger than the signal) and no physiological motion information can be obtained before contact. Cagneau, Zemiti, Bellot, and Morel (2007) have proposed a force feedback control scheme to compensate the periodic motion of organs. Iterative learning control was implemented as an outer loop to reject periodic disturbances, reducing bad transients during the learning phase.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…physiological perturbation e : measured ecg signal In previous work, [21], the authors show that the inner loop alone is well suited for robotic surgery due to its stability and robustness to changes in nature and geometry of contacts but it is unable to finely reject periodic disturbances with large magnitude [5]. The outer predictive control loop is set to overcome this limitation.…”
Section: A Error Feedback Force Control Scheme With Anticipation Termmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, contrarily to [4], the goal is not to stabilize the heart thanks to motion cancellation, but to apply a controlled force to the beating heart while following its motion. This idea was for example developed in [5] using ILC, which has the advantage of not requiring a model of the contact interaction but, again, exhibits low robustness to irregularities. Predictive force control for beating heart surgery has been proposed in [6], but in this paper, a linear model is assumed for the interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%