Physiological Measures of Risk Perception in Highly Automated Driving

Abstract

Highly automated driving will likely result in drivers being out-of-the-loop during specific scenarios and engaging in a wide range of non-driving related tasks. Manifesting in lower levels of risk perception to emerging events, and thus affect drivers' availability to take-over manual control in safety-critical scenarios. In this empirical research, we measured drivers' (N = 20) risk perception with cardiac and skin conductance indicators through a series of high-fidelity, simulated highly automated driving scenarios. By manipulating the presence of surrounding traffic and changing driving conditions as long-term risk modulators, and including a driving hazard event as a short-term risk modulator, we hypothesised that an increase in risk perception would induce greater physiological arousal. Our results demonstrate that heart rate variability features are superior at capturing arousal variations from these long-term, low to moderate risk scenarios. In contrast, skin conductance responses are more sensitive to rapidly evolving situations associated with moderate to high risk. Based on this research, future driver state monitoring systems should adopt multiple physiological measures to capture changes in the long and short term, modulation of risk perception. This will enable enhanced perception of driver readiness and improved availability to safely deal with take-over events when requested by an automated vehicle.

The Role of Technical Safety Riskiness and Behavioral Interventions in the Public Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles in China

“…In recent years, AV safety has become a key indicator of concern influencing user intention to adopt AVs following reports of traffic accidents involving AVs. Previous studies have shown that the safety risks of AVs and their scope are increasingly valued by users (Karnouskos 2021;Perello-March et al 2022).…”

The notorious B.I.T: The effects of a ransomware and a screen failure on distraction in automated driving

“…Some of them might have kept in mind they were in a driving simulator, while some others had mentioned they thought it was a spam and did not pay much attention to it. Recent work suggesting that drivers' perception of risk in automated driving was diminished in simulators supports that assumption (Perelló-March et al, 2022). Despite the limitations of it being a simulator research, the results still showed that the experiment was engaging enough to draw their attention and not ignore the HMI.…”

Towards a guide for developers and novice researchers on human-centered design of the take-over request—Combining user experience and human factors

“…Also, reaction times were found to be higher in automated driving compared to manual driving, which they attribute to potential mental underload (Young and Stanton 2007). On the other hand, Perello-March et al (2022) state that some NDRTs performed during highly automated driving may also increase arousal above the optimum and therefore decrease performance.…”