2005
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eri053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological evidence for a sodium-dependent high-affinity phosphate and nitrate transport at the plasma membrane of leaf and root cells of Zostera marina L.

Abstract: Zostera marina L. is an angiosperm that grows in a medium in which inorganic phosphate (P(i)) and nitrate (NO(3)(-)) are present in micromolar concentrations and must be absorbed against a steep electrochemical potential gradient. The operation of a Na(+)-dependent NO(3)(-) transport was previously demonstrated in leaf cells of this plant, suggesting that other Na(+)-coupled systems could mediate the uptake of anions. To address this question, P(i) transport was studied in leaves and roots of Z. marina, as wel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
52
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we use results from Essah et al (2003) in an example, in which an exchange half-time of 5 min is endorsed (Cheeseman 1982), and a unidirectional influx of as high as 300μmol g −1 (fresh wt) h −1 is reported (at 200 mM external [Na + ]; see their Fig. 2), a cytosolic concentration of Na + is predicted to be about 700 mM, more than two orders of magnitude higher than some reported microelectrode measurements at the same, or higher, external Na + concentrations (Carden et al 2003;Rubio et al 2005).…”
Section: Osmotic and Ionic Effects: What Is The Difference?mentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If we use results from Essah et al (2003) in an example, in which an exchange half-time of 5 min is endorsed (Cheeseman 1982), and a unidirectional influx of as high as 300μmol g −1 (fresh wt) h −1 is reported (at 200 mM external [Na + ]; see their Fig. 2), a cytosolic concentration of Na + is predicted to be about 700 mM, more than two orders of magnitude higher than some reported microelectrode measurements at the same, or higher, external Na + concentrations (Carden et al 2003;Rubio et al 2005).…”
Section: Osmotic and Ionic Effects: What Is The Difference?mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Perhaps because of uncertainties with these and other methods, ion-specific microelectrode measurements of cytosolic Na + accumulation have become the new standard (Munns and Tester 2008). Surprisingly, however, given that cytosolic [Na + ] is considered to be a critical factor in Na + toxicity, very few studies have measured it using microelectrode technology (Carden et al 2003;Rubio et al 2005); clearly, much more progress needs to be made in this area.…”
Section: Osmotic and Ionic Effects: What Is The Difference?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is possible due to an efficient uptake of nutrients from the water column and sediment pore water and to a mechanism of conservation, where older leaves act as nutrient sinks which afterwards are translocated to more actively growing and nutrient demanding tissues (Pedersen and Borum, 1992). Nutrients are taken up directly from the water column through leaves and from the sediment pore water through roots (Zimmerman et al, 1987;Hemminga et al, 1994;Bocci et al, 1997;Hemminga, 1998;Sfriso and Marcomini, 1999) but with differences in uptake (Rubio et al, 2005). Sediments are considered the primary nutrient source for seagrass roots, yet they may not have the capacity to support total nutrient requirements seeing as the uptake can be limited by diffusion (Touchette and Burkholder, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, cytosolic K + activities were directly measured by double-barreled K + -selective microelectrodes. The microelectrode pre-treatment and backfilling was similar to the H + -or Na + -selective microelectrodes described previously (Ferná ndez et al, 1999;Rubio et al, 2005). The microelectrodes were filled with a K + -sensor cocktail containing potassium ionophore I (cocktail B, cat.…”
Section: Electrophysiological Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%