1984
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.2327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological effects associated with the use of respiratory protective devices. A review.

Abstract: LOUHEVAARA VA. Physiological effects associated with the use of respiratory protective devices: A review. Scand J Work Environ Health 10 (1984) 275-281. Several types of filtering (air-purifying) devices, air-line (supplied-air) apparatus, and self-contained breathing apparatus are used at work. The most important parameters of the respiratory protective devices that affect physical work capacity are additional inspiratory and expiratory breathing resistance, dead space, and weight. The main physiological effe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy cost of walking and/or running increased by 13-18% with 9.3 kg military PPE (23) and 11-21% with firefighter PPE (7) compared with the energy cost of wearing light clothing. On the other hand, studies have found significant decreases in VO 2max by 10-17% wearing SCBA alone, (24,25) 17-20% with wearing PPE and SCBA. (10,20,26) It seems that increased sub-maximal VO 2 and decreased VO 2max due to the use of PPE are attributable to a number of factors, including heat stress inside the semiimpermeable firefighter PPE, (6,8) a hobbling/binding effect caused by bulkiness and stiffness that can interfere with joint movements and/or the frictional resistance that results from clothing layers sliding over one another, (23) tight SCBA harness impeding ventilation and tidal volume, (24,27) and the direct effect of PPE weight.…”
Section: Effects Of Ppe On Oxygen Uptakementioning
confidence: 96%
“…The energy cost of walking and/or running increased by 13-18% with 9.3 kg military PPE (23) and 11-21% with firefighter PPE (7) compared with the energy cost of wearing light clothing. On the other hand, studies have found significant decreases in VO 2max by 10-17% wearing SCBA alone, (24,25) 17-20% with wearing PPE and SCBA. (10,20,26) It seems that increased sub-maximal VO 2 and decreased VO 2max due to the use of PPE are attributable to a number of factors, including heat stress inside the semiimpermeable firefighter PPE, (6,8) a hobbling/binding effect caused by bulkiness and stiffness that can interfere with joint movements and/or the frictional resistance that results from clothing layers sliding over one another, (23) tight SCBA harness impeding ventilation and tidal volume, (24,27) and the direct effect of PPE weight.…”
Section: Effects Of Ppe On Oxygen Uptakementioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, wearing these devices can impose physiologic and psychologic stress (Dahlback and Balldin, 1984;Dubois et al, 1990;Harber, 1984;Harber et al, 1996Harber et al, , 1982Hodous, 1986;Louhevaara et al, 1985;Louhevaara, 1984;Morgan, 1983). Although wearing a respirator is well tolerated by most individuals, persons with underlying medical conditions or limited cardiopulmonary reserve may be at risk for adverse health events as a result of use of these devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies [21,29,33] involving asbestos abatement support these findings of the importance of controls in reducing exposure and requirements of respirators. It has been suggested that respirator use at low occupational exposure concentrations may have a more detrimental effect on the worker than benefit [21,29,[49][50][51]. This study along with others [4,12,14,21,29,52] in abatement of hazardous building materials demonstrates the importance of engineering and work practice controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%