1977
DOI: 10.1016/s0367-2530(17)32126-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological Ecology of CO2 Fixation in Bromeliaceae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
58
1
5

Year Published

1981
1981
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
58
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Under conditions of constant temperature and RH throughout the day and night, they observed maximal CO2 uptake rates at 15 and 20 C and inhibition of CO2 uptake at 25 C and above. The responses to low nighttime temperature (5 C and below) were similar in the two studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Under conditions of constant temperature and RH throughout the day and night, they observed maximal CO2 uptake rates at 15 and 20 C and inhibition of CO2 uptake at 25 C and above. The responses to low nighttime temperature (5 C and below) were similar in the two studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, a fair number of other examples are now also given in the literature, where true stress induces features of CAM in short-term or in seasonal shifts, e.g. in Portulacaria and Peperomia (Hanscom & Ting, 1978;Guralnick, Rorabaugh & Hanscom, 1984;Guralnick & Ting, 1986) and Sedum species (Kluge, 1977;Lee & Griffiths, 1987), in the epiphytic Crassulaceae Kalanchoe unifiora (Schafer & Luttge, 1986) and the epiphytic bromeliad Guzmania monostachia (Medina et al, 1977). Figure 8 compares some field measurements on epiphytic bromeliads performed in Trinidad during the dry season in March (Griffiths et al, 1986).…”
Section: Comparison Between Two Cam Species and Seasonal Change Of Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been numerous studies of the responses of C3 species to sun and shade (4), yet little characterization of CAM plants grown under different PFD.3 Many horticultural CAM plants are grown indoors in dim light, and many other CAM plants grow naturally in deep shade as rainforest epiphytes (3,13,16,25), but little is known of the effects of shade on CAM. Our lack of understanding of these responses is due, in large part, to the complicated gas exchange characteristics exhibited by plants possessing CAM (19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%