1995
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.92.7.1902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological Basis of Myocardial Contrast Enhancement in Fast Magnetic Resonance Images of 2-Day-Old Reperfused Canine Infarcts

Abstract: In contrast-enhanced MR images of 2-day-old reperfused canine infarcts, myocardial regions of hypoenhancement are related to the no-reflow phenomenon. Approximately 90% of the myocardium within hyperenhanced regions is nonviable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

13
279
2
11

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 412 publications
(305 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
13
279
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this notion of a confinement of no-reflow to infarcted myocardium is based on experimental studies with mechanical occlusion and reperfusion of virgin coronary arteries or clinical studies using MRI several days after established reperfusion. In such experimental studies, coronary microembolization with subsequent microinfarcts into not grossly infarcted myocardium of the area at risk does not occur, and in such clinical studies using MRI coronary microembolization might occur but not be detected, as MRI identifies no-reflow areas as areas of hypoenhancement within areas of hyperenhancement, i.e., grossly infarcted myocardium [11,23]. Microinfarction after microembolization is only detected by MRI when affecting more than 5 % of myocardium [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this notion of a confinement of no-reflow to infarcted myocardium is based on experimental studies with mechanical occlusion and reperfusion of virgin coronary arteries or clinical studies using MRI several days after established reperfusion. In such experimental studies, coronary microembolization with subsequent microinfarcts into not grossly infarcted myocardium of the area at risk does not occur, and in such clinical studies using MRI coronary microembolization might occur but not be detected, as MRI identifies no-reflow areas as areas of hypoenhancement within areas of hyperenhancement, i.e., grossly infarcted myocardium [11,23]. Microinfarction after microembolization is only detected by MRI when affecting more than 5 % of myocardium [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Extracellular MR contrast media such as Gd-DTPA are passively distributed into the interstitium from intact capillaries in normal myocardium. Disruption of cellular membrane, expansion of interstitium, and increased blood volume provide an expanded distribution volume for these agents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PIS PIM ϭ 100 ⅐ IMS PIM / m slice [6] where m slice was the mass of the slice obtained by summing all voxel masses in the slice. TIM PIM was calculated by summing IMS PIM from all SAX slices plus the apex.…”
Section: Pim Image Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigators have found that in ceMRI, ie, MRI enhanced typically with a gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agent (CA), a signal enhancement of myocardial tissue occurs in acutely reperfused infarcts (4,5). This enhancement starts a few hours after cellular damage but still occurs even on the second day of infarct (6), and can be observed even in the healed phase of myocardial infarction (7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%