Abstract:Background
Liposuction can remove a substantial amount of body fat. We investigated the effects of liposuction of large volumes of fat on anthropometrics, body composition (BIA), metabolic hormones, and psychological measures in overweight/obese women. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine both physiological and psychological changes following liposuction of large volumes of fat in humans.
Method
Nine premenopausal healthy overweight/obese women (age = 35.9 ± 7.1 SD, weight = 84.4 kg ± 13.6, B… Show more
“…And some studies have found that central obesity is positively associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and some other diseases (26,27). Other studies showed that waist circumference decreased signi cantly after liposuction (F 3,24 = 44.5, p < 0.001; post hoc, all p's < 0.03) (28)(29)(30). However, to our knowledge, very few studies have discussed the connection between WC and liposuction volume and provided an equation for lipoaspirate estimation.…”
Background: Previous studies revealed that larger liposuction volumes were related to an increased risk of complications. However, no concrete data exist to support the most critical factor which affects the liposuction volume in the waist and abdominal area. This study was undertaken to investigate the relationship between the anthropometric measurements and lipoaspirate volume.Methods: The present study was a single-center retrospective study. 742 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria in our hospital, from January 2001 to August 2020, were reviewed. Spearman correlation analyses and multivariable regressions were used to assess the relationship between the anthropometric measurements and lipoaspirate volume. Linear-by-linear association chi-square statistic and Goodman-Kruskal gamma method were used to test the consistency and to develop a rank prediction formula.Results: A total of 742 patients aged 18-59 years old met the inclusion criteria. Among all the anthropometric measurements, the highest correlation coefficient was observed in waist circumference. Subgroup analyses indicated that there was an interaction between the BMI and waist circumference on liposuction volume. Formula was generated to estimate the range of liposuction volume based on the nine grouped waist circumferences [liposuction volume (mean) = 106.3 waist circumference (mean) - 7497, P < 0.001, adjusted R2 = 0.9638].Conclusions: Waist circumference was the most influential factor for lipoaspirate volume. Roughly predicting the lipoaspirate volume allows surgeons to estimate their operating volume even if no iconography machine is available during suction-assisted lipectomy. This can increase safety, potentially decreasing the number of adverse events.
“…And some studies have found that central obesity is positively associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and some other diseases (26,27). Other studies showed that waist circumference decreased signi cantly after liposuction (F 3,24 = 44.5, p < 0.001; post hoc, all p's < 0.03) (28)(29)(30). However, to our knowledge, very few studies have discussed the connection between WC and liposuction volume and provided an equation for lipoaspirate estimation.…”
Background: Previous studies revealed that larger liposuction volumes were related to an increased risk of complications. However, no concrete data exist to support the most critical factor which affects the liposuction volume in the waist and abdominal area. This study was undertaken to investigate the relationship between the anthropometric measurements and lipoaspirate volume.Methods: The present study was a single-center retrospective study. 742 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria in our hospital, from January 2001 to August 2020, were reviewed. Spearman correlation analyses and multivariable regressions were used to assess the relationship between the anthropometric measurements and lipoaspirate volume. Linear-by-linear association chi-square statistic and Goodman-Kruskal gamma method were used to test the consistency and to develop a rank prediction formula.Results: A total of 742 patients aged 18-59 years old met the inclusion criteria. Among all the anthropometric measurements, the highest correlation coefficient was observed in waist circumference. Subgroup analyses indicated that there was an interaction between the BMI and waist circumference on liposuction volume. Formula was generated to estimate the range of liposuction volume based on the nine grouped waist circumferences [liposuction volume (mean) = 106.3 waist circumference (mean) - 7497, P < 0.001, adjusted R2 = 0.9638].Conclusions: Waist circumference was the most influential factor for lipoaspirate volume. Roughly predicting the lipoaspirate volume allows surgeons to estimate their operating volume even if no iconography machine is available during suction-assisted lipectomy. This can increase safety, potentially decreasing the number of adverse events.
“…Saleh et al, [7] in their study showed that significant effect in buttock and thigh measurements preoperatively and 4 months after large volume liposuction. Geliebter et al, [13], found that abdominal circumference decreased overtime, in periods from October 2015 to May 2017 with total of 83 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Geliebter et al, [13], demonstrated that body composition analysis at 10 weeks after liposuction caused a (9.4±1.8) kgreduction in body fat (16±2%) of total fat mass. While the visceral adipose tissuedid not change.…”
Objective: To study the effect of large volume liposuction on body weight and total body fat in overweight and obese patients (BMI from 25-35) and in patients with localized lipodystrophy.Background: Liposuction has become one of the most popular cosmetic procedures performed by plastic surgeon.Method: This study was conducted on 31 patients presented with localized accumulation of fat either in thigh, abdomen, back or gluteal region and arms or in generalized overweight patients with BMI 25-30 and obese patients' class 1 with BMI 30-35 will undergo large volume liposuction in Plastic Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University. All studied patients were subjected to take a full history, general examination and local examination (for the area to be suctioned). Laboratory investigations as: Complete blood counts (CBC), blood glucose level, kidney function tests, liver function tests and bleeding profile.Results: There were statistically significant difference between preoperative measurements of total body fat and (3 months, 6 months) postoperatively (p<0.01).There was statistically significant difference between the preoperative measurements of visceral fat and postoperative measurements (after 3 months and 6 months) (p<0.01).
Conclusion:We found that the large volume liposuction in our patients, significantly reduces the weight, BMI, total body fat, visceral fat, circumference of abdomen and gluteal region.
“…In agreement with these results, a study in New York, United States using the same BSQ tool reported significant improvements in body shape concerns following liposuction. [30] A main objective of cosmetic interventions in general, and liposuction in particular, is to improve patients' selfesteem. In the present study, the scores of self-esteem were low in all its three domains of appearance, academic performance, and social evaluation.…”
Obesity is a growing public health problem in Egypt, with many physical and psychological deleterious effects. Liposuction could have a positive effect on patients' psychology. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of liposuction on overweight/obese patients' eating concerns, body shape concerns, and self-esteem. This quasi-experimental one-group study was conducted in Bedayat private Hospital in Cairo on 70 adult patients undergoing liposuction. A self-administered questionnaire with three validated scales for eating concerns, body shape concerns, and self-esteem was utilized in data collection before and after liposuction. The fieldwork lasted from April to July 2018. The results showed that 84.3% of the patients were, with age range 23 to 58 years. There were significant decreases in the percentages of patients having dyslipidemia, from 25.7% before the liposuction to 5.7% after the liposuction (p=0.001). The scores of eating showed improvements (p<0.001), and the frequency of unhealthy eating practices decreased (p<0.001). The mean score of body shape concerns decreased from 5.1 before liposuction to 2.1 after liposuction (p<0.001), whereas the mean sores of self-esteem domains increased (p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, liposuction was the only significant independent negative predictor of the eating concern and body shape concern scores, and a significant positive predictor of the self-esteem score. In conclusion, liposuction is a safe procedure that leads to significant improvements in the patients' eating concerns, body shape concerns, and self-esteem. The procedure is recommended for those suffering from such concerns and/or having low self-esteem. Further research is proposed to examine the long-term effects of liposuction on these parameters.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.