2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00299-020-02623-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological and metabolic bases of increased growth in the tomato ethylene-insensitive mutant Never ripe: extending ethylene signaling functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
1
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, FB1 stress can affect the water uptake of tomato plants under both applied concentrations. Moreover, FB1-induced stomatal closure also confined CO 2 assimilation in both genotypes and reduced photosynthetic activity (Sapko et al 2011;Chen and Gallie 2015;Nascimento et al 2021). Despite the fact that ET-induced stomatal closure has also been reported in several studies (Desikan et al 2006;Ceusters and Van de Poel 2018), there were no significant differences in stomatal conductance between the two tomato genotypes after FB1 treatments based on our investigations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Hence, FB1 stress can affect the water uptake of tomato plants under both applied concentrations. Moreover, FB1-induced stomatal closure also confined CO 2 assimilation in both genotypes and reduced photosynthetic activity (Sapko et al 2011;Chen and Gallie 2015;Nascimento et al 2021). Despite the fact that ET-induced stomatal closure has also been reported in several studies (Desikan et al 2006;Ceusters and Van de Poel 2018), there were no significant differences in stomatal conductance between the two tomato genotypes after FB1 treatments based on our investigations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Therefore, FA exposure caused stomatal closure after 24 h in both tomato genotypes influencing water uptake by plants. Although, Nr mutants showed basically a higher stomatal conductance and assimilation and thus a higher biomass production (Nascimento et al 2020), FA exposure rapidly reduced these parameters. The stomatal closure restricted CO2 uptake in FA-treated plants and led to the suppression of photosynthetic activity (Sapko et al 2011.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Nr plants exhibit insensitivity to ET in all tissues but are able to produce ET, e.g., upon pathogen attack, indicating that mutants are not impaired in ET biosynthesis (Lanahan et al 1994). Using this mutant provides a more precise analysis of the physiological and biochemical functions of ET (Nascimento et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nr in tomato was identified as a dominant mutation in all vegetative tissues, including leaves. This mutant has functional ET biosynthesis, whereas ET signaling is blocked (Nascimento et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Other downstream elements of the ET signaling, such as the negative regulator Raf-like serine/threonine kinase CONSTITUTIVE TRIPLE RESPONSE 1 (CTR1) and the positive regulator ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE 2 (EIN2), are also associated with the ER (Chang, 2016). Tomato plants possess seven ET receptors,i.e.,SlETR1,SlETR2,SlETR3,SlETR4,SlETR5,SlETR6,and SlETR7, five of which were shown to bind ET with high affinity (Nascimento et al, 2021). SlETR3 is also known as Never ripe (Nr), which is the ortholog of the Arabidopsis ETR1 receptor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%