2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological and management factors contributing to soybean potential yield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
43
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
4
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The expected gain was reduced for the SW and SY traits under a milder selection intensity, while the opposite occurred for the EFP variable. The lower genetic gains for EPF observed in this study can be explained by the high genotype × interaction effect (Table 1), corroborating Van Roekel, Purcell, and Salmerón (2015), who conducted a review on the increase in the soybean yield potential. Similar findings were described by Pereira et al (2017), who selected progeny or lines of soybean for the variables absolute maturity and grain yield.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The expected gain was reduced for the SW and SY traits under a milder selection intensity, while the opposite occurred for the EFP variable. The lower genetic gains for EPF observed in this study can be explained by the high genotype × interaction effect (Table 1), corroborating Van Roekel, Purcell, and Salmerón (2015), who conducted a review on the increase in the soybean yield potential. Similar findings were described by Pereira et al (2017), who selected progeny or lines of soybean for the variables absolute maturity and grain yield.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These findings suggested that for Enrei, at least, extension of the period from R1 to R3 contributed to the increased pod number, which in turn increased the seed yield. It was widely accepted that the critical period for determination of pods and seeds in soybean is R1 to the beginning of seed filling (R5) period (e.g., Van Roekel, Purcell, & Salmerón, ). Nakano et al () showed that the duration from R1 to R5 also increased by 8 to 10 days with increasing growth temperature in Enrei at the same TGC experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crop productivity is a quantitative trait determined by a variety of factors (Van Roekel et al, 2015). Abiotic soil characteristics such as water and nitrogen availability are well-known for being productivity-limiting factors (Durán et al, 2014), and weather conditions such as rainfall or temperature may significantly impact on crop productivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%