1997
DOI: 10.1086/297495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological and Anatomical Responses to Water Deficits in the Cam Epiphyte Tillandsia ionantha (Bromeliaceae)

Abstract: Although physiological responses to drought have been examined in several species of epiphytic bromeliads, few have included a comprehensive methodological approach to the study of the carbon and water relations of a single species undergoing drought stress. Thus, physiological and anatomical responses to an imposed drought treatment were examined in the atmospheric Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) epiphyte Tillandsia ionantha. From 0 through 20 d without water, nocturnal malic acid accumulation and C0 2 upt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, after 50 days of drought the metabolizing region of Tillandsia ionantha Planch. leaf not shows a strong desiccation, allowing a positive assimilation of CO 2 ; consequence of water movement from the hydrenchyma to the chlorenchyma (Nowak and Martin, 1997). Moreover, the presence of hydrenchyma in Tillandsia usneoides allowed an increase of 700 % in tissue water content after a rain and a reduction of 300 % after a severe drought (Penfound and Deiler, 1947).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, after 50 days of drought the metabolizing region of Tillandsia ionantha Planch. leaf not shows a strong desiccation, allowing a positive assimilation of CO 2 ; consequence of water movement from the hydrenchyma to the chlorenchyma (Nowak and Martin, 1997). Moreover, the presence of hydrenchyma in Tillandsia usneoides allowed an increase of 700 % in tissue water content after a rain and a reduction of 300 % after a severe drought (Penfound and Deiler, 1947).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the measured water potential of atmospheric epiphytes, T. usneoides included, has rarely been observed below 21 MPa (Martin, 1994). In one experiment with Tillandsia ionantha, total plant water potential did not drop below 20.75 MPa after 60 d of imposed drought (Nowak and Martin, 1997). Considering that the water potential of air at h = 0.99 is 21.4 MPa (and 22.8 MPa at h = 0.98, both at 20°C), it is hard to imagine a scenario in which water adsorbed onto trichomes that are in equilibrium with subsaturated air could move against the water potential gradient into the living cells of T. usneoides, and the work of Martin and Schmitt (1989) and the plant tissue is covered with liquid water, the trichomes become appressed against the cuticle and channel the absorption of liquid water into the underlying living cells (Benzing et al, 1976).…”
Section: Leaf-water Dmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…One possibility is that these were well-hydrated greenhouse plants, so the rates of CO 2 recycling would be low when compared to CO 2 assimilated during night. In another study, Nowak and Martin [94] analyzed the CAM responses of Tillandsia ionantha under drought for 60 days. From the 30 th day on, the CO 2 uptake started to drop until the 60 th day.…”
Section: Type IV Bromeliadsmentioning
confidence: 99%